Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment as provided· [2024] KEELRC 1832 (KLR)

Kariuki v Widrups Groups Limited & another (Cause E710 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1832 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
4 July 2024
2,845 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled an intern is legally an employee entitled to unpaid wages, but threw out her unfair termination claim because she couldn't prove it.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant sued the Respondents alleging she was employed on 5th April 2022 as a Resident Engineer at a gross salary of Kshs.92,142/= and that her employment was unfairly terminated on 17th January 2023 without notice, reason or hearing. She sought a declaration of unfair termination, notice pay, salary arrears, house allowance, compensation, a certificate of service, costs and interest. The Respondents contended she was merely an intern attached at the instance of her father's friend, Engineer Dominic Mwaniki, paid Kshs.75,000/= monthly, that she abandoned the attachment, and admitted owing Kshs.175,000/= for the internship. The court framed three issues: employment status, fairness of termination, and reliefs. Relying on the Claimant's bank statements showing regular monthly payments, the court found a monetary employment relationship but held that the Claimant, lacking proof of engineering qualifications or engagement as a Resident Engineer, was an indentured learner and thus an employee. On termination, applying Section 47(5) of the Employment Act, the court found the Claimant's two inconsistent accounts uncorroborated and unproven, and dismissed the unfair termination claim and related reliefs including notice pay, house allowance and compensation. However, the uncontroverted claim for unpaid salary from October 2022 to 17 days into January 2023 succeeded, and a certificate of service was ordered. The suit was otherwise dismissed with each party bearing their own costs. Judgment delivered virtually at Nairobi on 4th July 2024 by Dr. Jacob Gakeri, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Employment status of the Claimant

Holding

The Claimant was an indentured learner and thus an employee of the Respondent.

Reasoning

The bank statements showed regular monthly payments establishing a monetary relationship, but no verifiable evidence proved engagement as a Resident Engineer. The Claimant produced no qualification documents despite alleging she was an engineer. The Respondent's account of an internship arranged through Engineer Mwaniki at Kshs.75,000/= monthly was found more credible, and under the Employment Act and Industrial Training Act definitions, the Claimant fell within the category of an indentured learner, hence an employee.

p. 5
02

Whether termination was unfair

Holding

The Claimant failed to prove that her employment was terminated at all, or that any termination was unfair.

Reasoning

Section 47(5) places the burden of proving unfair termination on the employee. The Claimant gave two inconsistent versions (Mr. Mumo's communication on 17th January versus instructions to hand over and resign on 19th January), produced no corroboration, and her Labour Office letter contradicted her written statement on dates. The Respondent denied terminating her. On the totality, the Claimant did not prove termination within the meaning of Section 45.

p. 6
03

Salary arrears

Holding

Uncontroverted evidence of unpaid salary from October 2022 to mid-January 2023 was awarded at Kshs.70,000/= net per month.

Reasoning

The Respondents admitted owing Kshs.175,000/= for the internship and did not controvert the Claimant's evidence that she was unpaid for October, November, December 2022 and 17 days of January 2023. The court awarded the net monthly figure of Kshs.70,000/= for the three full months plus 17 days, without requiring proof of unfair termination since the debt was admitted or uncontroverted.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • Fair termination requires both substantive justification and procedural fairness.
  • The burden of proving unfair termination rests on the employee, and is not discharged by bare allegations.
  • An intern/attachment without a written contract may qualify as an indentured learner and thus an employee under Section 2(1) of the Employment Act.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Award of unpaid salary for October, November and December 2022 of Kshs.210,000/= (Kshs.70,000 x 3).
  2. 2.Award of salary for 17 days worked in January 2023 of Kshs.38,387.1; total award Kshs.248,387.1.
  3. 3.Certificate of service to be issued within 30 days.
  4. 4.Parties shall bear own costs.
  5. 5.Claim otherwise dismissed.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 2(1); Section 45; Section 47(5); Section 51
  • Industrial Training ActSection 2
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court ActSection 12(4)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 1B
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d); Article 48

Cases cited (8)

  • Pauline Nyokabi Mwangi V Valley Hospital Ltd
    (2017) eKLR
  • Walter Ogal Anuro V Teachers Service Commission
    (2013) eKLR
  • Linus Songwa Musamali V Bamco Construction Company
    (2020) eKLR
  • Everret Aviation Ltd V Kenya Revenue Authority
    (2013) eKLR
  • Peter Ngunjiri Kariuki V Board of Management Magomano Secondary School
    (2022) eKLR
  • Naima Khamis V Oxford University Press (EA) Ltd
    (2017) eKLR
  • Nicholus Kipkemoi Korir V Hatari Security Guards
    (2016) eKLR
  • Cecilia Karuru Ngayu V Barclays Bank of Kenya & another
    (2016) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, Section 12 (employment and labour relations disputes)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kariuki v Widrups Groups Limited & another (Cause E710 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1832 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment as provided. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/1832/eng@2024-07-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.