Chemutai v County Government of Nakuru & 3 others (Judicial Review E001 of 2024) [2024] KEELRC 1780 (KLR)
The bottom line
#What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Entitlement to mandamus enforcing a decree against a county government
The court was satisfied the application had merit and allowed it as prayed, the respondents having not opposed
The applicant obtained leave on 16th February 2024 to file judicial review proceedings for mandamus to enforce a decree of Kshs5,360,504/= plus costs of Kshs192,504/= issued on 27th July 2023 in Nakuru CMCC Misc. Civil Application No. E092 of 2023. A certificate of an order against a county government was issued. The application was supported by a statutory statement, verifying affidavit and annexures. Despite service, the respondents did not respond, and the court, on reading the application and supporting documents, found it merited and allowed it as prayed with costs.
Legal principles established
#- Mandamus may issue to compel a county government and its accounting officers to settle a judgment debt with assessed costs and interest
Court orders
#- 1.An order of mandamus compelling the respondents to pay the ex-parte applicant Kshs5,360,504/= plus costs of Kshs192,504/=, with interest at 14% per annum on both sums from July 2023 until payment in full
- 2.The applicant is granted the costs of the application, assessed at Kshs20,000/=
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Order 53 Rule 3(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules (judicial review for mandamus to enforce a decree against a county government)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Chemutai v County Government of Nakuru & 3 others (Judicial Review E001 of 2024) [2024] KEELRC 1780 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Judicial Review Application (Notice of Motion dated 28th February 2024), Nakuru High Court. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/1780/eng@2024-07-11
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.