Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedPetition No. E129 of 2023· [2024] KEELRC 1731 (KLR)

Mohamed v Director of Occupational Safety & Health Services & another (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E129 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1731 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
9 July 2024
935 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court awarded an injured worker over Kshs 21 million after his employer failed to appeal the government's injury assessment in time.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The petitioner, injured at work on 26th September 2019, petitioned the Employment and Labour Relations Court in Nairobi seeking declarations that he was an employee of the 2nd respondent entitled to fair labour practices and access to justice under Article 48; that the 2nd respondent violated the Work Injury Benefits Act by failing to report the accident and file DOSH Form 1; that the 1st respondent violated the Act by failing to inquire into and assess compensation; orders of mandamus compelling the 2nd respondent to file the accident notice form and the 1st respondent to assess compensation; and damages and costs. The court received a report from the Deputy Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services, Mr Justus Nyakego, dated 17th May 2024, who explained that an injured person is entitled to compensation for temporary incapacitation, permanent incapacity, incurred medical expenses and future medical expenses. The 2nd respondent asked for a further mention to avail the outcome of a judicial review it had filed at the High Court, but those proceedings were never presented to the court. The court found no grounds to delay the award of this very old case, noting that the 2nd respondent had not appealed the DOSH assessment report before the Employment Court as the procedure requires. The court adopted the report and awarded Kshs 1,958,400 in work injury compensation, Kshs 209,625 in transport expenses, Kshs 11,750,595.80 in incurred medical expenses and Kshs 8,000,000 in future medical expenses, with stipulated payment timelines, interest at court rates on default, and costs of the petitioner borne by the 2nd respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the court should adopt the Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services' assessment report and award compensation

Holding

The court adopted the report and awarded work injury compensation, transport expenses, incurred medical expenses and future medical expenses as assessed.

Reasoning

The Deputy Director of DOSH explained the components of compensation considered in preparing the report. The 2nd respondent sought delay pending the outcome of a judicial review filed at the High Court, but that review was never presented to the court. The court found no grounds to delay a very old case, noting that the 2nd respondent had not appealed the assessment report before the Employment Court as the procedure requires.

p. 2
02

Whether a pending, undisclosed judicial review justifies staying the award

Holding

No. The court found no grounds to delay the award.

Reasoning

The 2nd respondent requested an adjournment to avail the outcome of a judicial review filed at the High Court. The judgment records that the review proceedings were never presented to the court, leaving the court unaware of their subject matter. In those circumstances the court declined to delay resolution of the claim, which had been pending since June 2023 arising from injuries sustained in September 2019.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A party who disputes a DOSH assessment report must appeal it before the Employment Court; absent such an appeal, the court is obliged to adopt the report.
  • An injured worker is entitled to compensation covering temporary incapacitation, permanent incapacity, medical expenses incurred and future medical expenses.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Work injury compensation of Kshs 1,958,400/- payable 30 days from the date of judgment
  2. 2.Kshs 209,625/- being transport expenses payable 30 days from the date of judgment
  3. 3.Incurred medical expenses of Kshs 11,750,595.80 payable 30 days from the date of judgment
  4. 4.Future medical expenses of Kshs 8,000,000/- payable within 6 months from the date of judgment
  5. 5.Costs of the petitioner to be borne by the 2nd respondent
  6. 6.Any delay in settling the above within the given timelines will attract interest at Court rates from date of default till full payment

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 48
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d)
  • Work Injury Benefits Actnot specified
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 1B
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court over fair labour practices and Work Injury Benefits Act claims (not expressly cited in the excerpt; the judgment invokes Article 48 of the Constitution on access to justice)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mohamed v Director of Occupational Safety & Health Services & another (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E129 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1731 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Petition No. E129 of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/1731/eng@2024-07-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.