Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCStruck OutPetition No E042 of 2022· [2024] KEELRC 1636 (KLR)

Omao v County Government of Nyamira & 5 others; Oyugi & 5 others (Interested Parties) (Petition E042 of 2022) [2024] KEELRC 1636 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya
27 June 2024
4,556 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~18 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Employment Court struck out a petition challenging Nyamira County chief officer appointments because the petitioner never first appealed to the Public Service Commission.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Petitioner, purporting to act for residents of Nyamira County, filed an amended petition challenging the creation of additional county departments and the recruitment, vetting and appointment of six Interested Parties as County Chief Officers. He sought injunctions to halt vetting and appointment, certiorari to quash the nomination list and the gazette notice of 28th May 2020, declarations that the process breached the County Governments Act and various constitutional provisions, and an order for a fresh statutory notice. The Respondents and Interested Parties filed a preliminary objection on exhaustion, which, by consent, was canvassed together with the petition. The court framed three issues: jurisdiction, the constitutional threshold of the petition, and entitlement to remedies. It held that Sections 77 and 87(2) of the County Governments Act and Public Service Commission Act clothed the Public Service Commission with first-instance appellate jurisdiction over recruitment, appointment and establishment of county offices, including Article 10 and Article 232 values complaints. Relying on Speaker v Karume, the NGOs Co-ordination Board and Hulbhai Gedi Abdille authorities, the court found the Petitioner had never appealed to the PSC and that the petition offended the doctrine of exhaustion. The remaining issues fell away and the petition was struck out with no orders as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the court had jurisdiction over a petition challenging county chief officer recruitment given the exhaustion doctrine

Holding

The court lacked jurisdiction; the dispute fell within the PSC's appellate mandate under Section 77 of the County Governments Act and Section 85 of the Public Service Commission Act, and the Petitioner had not appealed to the PSC

Reasoning

The petition impugned recruitment, vetting, appointment and the establishment/abolition of county offices. Section 77(2) of the County Governments Act and Section 85 of the PSC Act vest the PSC with jurisdiction over appeals on recruitment, selection and appointment, including decisions on national values (Article 10) and public service values (Article 232). Section 87(2) of the PSC Act bars court proceedings before exhausting the PSC procedure. The Petitioner conceded he never appealed to the PSC, so the petition offended the exhaustion doctrine and had to be struck out.

p. 11
02

Whether the petition met the constitutional (Anarita Karimi Njeru) threshold

Holding

Not determined, as the petition was struck out on jurisdiction

Reasoning

The Respondents argued the petition failed the Anarita Karimi Njeru precision threshold by citing omnibus constitutional provisions without specifying the Articles infringed and the manner of infringement. The court did not reach this question because the preliminary objection on exhaustion succeeded and the remaining issues fell away.

p. 11

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a statutory appeal mechanism exists, a party must exhaust it before invoking the court's process
  • The Public Service Commission has first-instance appellate jurisdiction over county public service recruitment and appointment disputes, including national values under Article 10 and public service values under Article 232

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The petition is struck out with no orders as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 1, 2, 10, 27(4), 28, 165(3)(d), 207, 232(1), 234(2)(i)
  • County Governments Act, 2012Sections 45(1), 45(5), 59, 59(1)(a)(b), 60, 61, 77(1), 77(2)
  • Public Appointments (County Assemblies Approval) Act, 2017Sections 6(2), 7(1)-(5), 11(1)
  • Public Service Commission ActSections 85, 87(2)
  • Public Finance Management Act, 2012Section 25(1)(a) and (b)
  • County Assembly of Nyamira Standing OrdersStanding Order 196(6)

Cases cited (13)

  • United States International University (USIU) v Attorney General
    (2012) eKLR
  • Prof. Daniel N. Mugendi v Kenyatta University and 3 others
    Civil Appeal No. 6 of 2012
  • Geoffrey Makana Asanyo v Nakuru Water And Sanitation Services Company And 6 Others
  • Judicial Service Commission v Gladys Boss Shollei & Another
    (2014) eKLR
  • Geoffrey Mworia v Water Resources Management Authority and 2 others
    (2015) eKLR
  • Karisa Chengo and 2 others v Republic
    (2015) eKLR
  • Abdikadir Suleiman v County Government of Isiolo & another
    (2015) eKLR
  • Speaker of the National Assembly v James Njenga Karume
    [1992] eKLR
  • NGOs Co-ordination Board v EG & 4 others; Katiba Institute (Amicus Curiae)
    (Petition 16 of 2019) [2023] KESC 17 (KLR)
  • William Odhiambo Ramogi & 3 others v Attorney General & 4 others; Muslims for Human Rights & 2 Others (interested parties)
    (2020) eKLR
  • Secretary, County Public Service Board & Ar v Hulbhai Gedi Abdille
    (2017) eKLR
  • Secretary County Public Service Board & another v Hulbhai Gedi Abdille
    [2017] eKLR
  • Anarita Karimi Njeru v Republic
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2) of the Constitution read with Article 165 (3)(d) (employment and labour relations and constitutional interpretation jurisdiction); contested against the exhaustion regime in Article 234(2)(i), Section 77 of the County Governments Act and Sections 85 and 87(2) of the Public Service Commission Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Omao v County Government of Nyamira & 5 others; Oyugi & 5 others (Interested Parties) (Petition E042 of 2022) [2024] KEELRC 1636 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Petition No E042 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/1636/eng@2024-06-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.