Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedELRC Appeal arising from Mombasa CMELRC E0393 of 2021 (application dated 12th April 2024)· [2024] KEELRC 1571 (KLR)

Dakawou Transport Limited v Kithuku (Appeal E060 of 2024) [2024] KEELRC 1571 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
20 June 2024
1,620 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa (M. Mbarũ J) on a notice of motion dated 12 April 2024 by the appellant seeking stay of execution of the judgment and decree of Hon. D.O. Mbeja delivered on 29 February 2024 in Mombasa CMELRC E0393 of 2021, in which the respondent was awarded Ksh.957,981 plus costs and interest, pending the hearing and determination of the appellant's appeal. The appellant explained the timing of the notice of appeal and memorandum of appeal by reference to late receipt of the judgment, the conduct of previous advocates, and a CTS downtime. The respondent opposed, arguing the application and intended appeal violated Order 9 rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules and that he held a valid judgment, with a notice of attachment issued on 9 April 2024. The court framed a single issue: whether to grant the stay and on what costs terms. It held Order 9 rule 9 does not restrict representation on appeal since the party has a right to legal representation under Section 22 of the ELRC Act and the motions under that rule end with the trial suit. It found the appeal was filed within the 30-day window in Section 17 of the ELRC Act. Applying the Butt v Rent Restriction Tribunal principles and Order 42 rule 6, the court allowed the application and granted a stay conditional on the appellant depositing 50% of the decretal sum in a joint interest-earning account within 30 days, filing the record of appeal, with mention on 22 July 2024. Costs were made to abide the outcome of the appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the application violated Order 9 Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Holding

It did not; the appellant is properly represented on appeal, since Order 9 rule 9 restrictions end with the trial suit and every party has a right to legal representation under Section 22 of the ELRC Act.

Reasoning

The court held the appeal is separate and different from the trial suit, and though it arises from that suit, the appellant has the right to secure its advocates for the appeal. Consent was filed between previous and current advocates. The appellant cannot be restricted in filing an appeal to the advocates who attended before the trial court.

p. 2
02

Whether to grant stay of execution pending appeal

Holding

Stay granted on condition the appellant deposits 50% of the decretal sum in a joint interest-earning account within 30 days.

Reasoning

The appeal was filed within time (21 days from judgment). The memorandum of appeal raises key questions of law and fact. Applying the Butt v Rent Restriction Tribunal principles and Order 42 rule 6, security was required to secure each party's rights and prevent the appeal being rendered nugatory, balancing the respondent's valid judgment against the appellant's right of appeal.

p. 3
03

Whether there was delay in filing the appeal

Holding

No; the appeal was filed within the 30-day period under Section 17 of the ELRC Act and Rule 8 of the ELRC (Procedure) Rules, 2016.

Reasoning

The judgment was delivered on 29 February 2024 and the memorandum of appeal was filed on 11 April 2024, within 21 days when computed taking into account Order 50 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules. There was therefore no delay in the appellant securing its rights of appeal.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Principles for granting stay of execution pending appeal as set out in Butt v Rent Restriction Tribunal: the discretion should be exercised so as not to prevent an appeal and a stay must be granted so an appeal is not rendered nugatory.
  • A party's right to legal representation on appeal is not restricted by Order 9 rule 9, which ends with the suit in the lower court.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Order of stay of execution of judgment in Mombasa CMELRC E393 of 2021 pending the hearing and determination of the appeal
  2. 2.Appellant to deposit 50% of Ksh.957,981 in a joint interest-earning account held by both parties within 30 days
  3. 3.Appellant to file the Record of Appeal and serve
  4. 4.Mention on 22 July 2024 for taking hearing directions
  5. 5.Costs to abide by the outcome of the appeal

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 9 rule 9
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 42 rule 6
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 50 rule 1
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder XLI Rule 4(2)(b)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011Section 22
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011Section 17
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016Rule 8

Cases cited (4)

  • Butt v Rent Restriction Tribunal
    [1979]
  • James Wangalwa & Another v Agnes Naliaka Cheseto
    null
  • Kenya Shell Limited v Kibiru
    [1986] KLR 410
  • Gianfranco Manenthi & Another v Africa Merchant Assurance Co Ltd
    [2019] eKLR
On appeal from
Employment and Labour Relations Court (trial court, Mombasa)
Mombasa CMELRC E0393 of 2021
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 17 and 22 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011; Rule 8 of the ELRC (Procedure) Rules, 2016; Order 42 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Dakawou Transport Limited v Kithuku (Appeal E060 of 2024) [2024] KEELRC 1571 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). ELRC Appeal arising from Mombasa CMELRC E0393 of 2021 (application dated 12th April 2024). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/1571/eng@2024-06-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.