Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNot stated in judgment· [2024] KEELRC 1415 (KLR)

Shiunzi v Nyali Academic Services Limited t/a the Mombasa Academy (Cause E122 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1415 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
20 March 2024
2,606 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, a History and Kiswahili teacher employed by the respondent on yearly renewable contracts, was injured in August 2023 during the school holidays and notified the deputy head teacher that he could not attend the 28 August 2023 pre-term meeting, submitting a medical note attributed to Dr S.A. Mohamed Hatimy of Coast General Hospital. He was later removed from the staff WhatsApp group, told on 5 September 2023 that his employment had ended because he had absconded and been replaced, and a letter posted on the D6 portal indicated his replacement. He claimed notice pay, pay for the unspent contract, 12 months' compensation, gratuity, service pay and a certificate of service. The respondent denied unfair termination, asserting the claimant refused to attend the designated Avenue Healthcare facility, relocated to Kakamega, and that inquiries established the medical note was fake, with no such doctor at the hospital and no record of treatment. The court framed two issues: unfair termination and remedies. It held an employee cannot terminate his own employment; an employer alleging abscondment must give notice under Section 44(3) and (4) and, on summary dismissal, copy the Labour Officer under Section 18(5)(b). Sick leave requires a Medical Certificate from a recognised facility, and the claimant refused the employer's designated provider and produced no valid certificate at trial. His absence was therefore unjustified gross misconduct. All monetary remedies were refused: notice pay and compensation were lost for frustrating his own employment, service pay was excluded by the employer's medical provision under Section 35(5) and (6), and gratuity was not a contractual term. The only sanction against the respondent was failure to report the absence to the Labour Officer. The claim was dismissed with each party bearing own costs, and the respondent ordered to issue the requisite Labour Officer notice and a Certificate of Service.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether there was unfair termination of employment

Holding

No unfair termination; the claimant's absence was not justified as he produced no Medical Certificate from a recognised facility and refused the employer's designated provider

Reasoning

The court accepted the employer's evidence that the medical note from Dr S.A. Mohamed Hatimy was fake and that the claimant refused to attend the designated Avenue Healthcare facility. Section 30 requires a Medical Certificate from a recognised health facility for sick leave. Absence without due cause is gross misconduct under Section 44(4)(a). Although the employer should have issued notice and copied the Labour Officer, the court held the claimant could not benefit from frustrating his own employment, so no unfair termination was established.

p. 4
02

Whether the remedies sought should issue

Holding

All monetary remedies refused; only the Certificate of Service and the requisite notice to the Labour Officer ordered

Reasoning

Notice pay and compensation were barred because the claimant frustrated his own employment. Service pay was excluded by the employer's medical provision under Section 35(5) and (6). Gratuity was not a contractual term. The only sanction against the respondent was the lapse in reporting the absence to the Labour Officer, which is prosecuted by that officer per Nyali International Beach Hotel. The claim was dismissed with each party bearing own costs.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • An employee does not terminate his own employment; where an employee absconds, the employer must issue notice under Section 44(3) and (4) of the Employment Act and, where summary dismissal follows, the notice must be copied to the Labour Officer within 7 days under Section 18(5)(b)
  • Sick leave is subject to the employee submitting a Medical Certificate from a recognised health facility, and where the employer has a designated facility, the employee ought to seek treatment there
  • Absence from work without due cause or a certified medical issue amounts to gross misconduct under Section 44(4)(a) of the Employment Act

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The respondent shall issue the requisite notice to the Labour Officer
  2. 2.The respondent shall issue the Certificate of Service for the period the claimant worked for the respondent
  3. 3.Each party to bear own costs
  4. 4.The claim is dismissed
Jurisdiction invoked
First-instance employment and labour relations claim under the Employment Act, 2007 (specific provision not stated in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Shiunzi v Nyali Academic Services Limited t/a the Mombasa Academy (Cause E122 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1415 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/1415/eng@2024-03-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.