Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCOtherMombasa CMELRC No. 116 of 2017 (appeal); underlying suit Mombasa CMCC No. 2342 of 2015· [2024] KEELRC 1366 (KLR)

Jiwani Impex Limited v Ndoro (Appeal E089 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1366 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
6 June 2024
1,572 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court sent this work injury jurisdiction fight back to the magistrates' court because the appeal record was too muddled to decide.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a first appeal to the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa (M. Mbarũ, J) against a ruling delivered on 17 August 2023 by Hon. Nabibya in which the magistrate dismissed the appellant's preliminary objection challenging the magistrates' court's jurisdiction to determine the respondent's work injury claim under the Work Injury Benefits Act, 2007. The appellant argued that section 16 of WIBA confers exclusive jurisdiction on the Director to investigate, calculate and award compensation, ousting common law remedies and the magistrates' court's jurisdiction, and that the Chief Justice's Practice Directions of 28 April 2023 (Gazette Notice No. 5476) issued following the Supreme Court decision in Law Society of Kenya v Attorney General could not override statute or confer jurisdiction on the magistrates' court. The respondent relied on the Gazette Notice and legitimate expectation of access to justice for litigants with pending claims. The court found the record of appeal 'not tidy': it was mixed up with the judgment in Mombasa CMELRC No. 116 of 2017, and the magistrate's ruling had addressed a notice dated 3 November 2020 rather than the preliminary objection dated 29 March 2022 under appeal. Declining to determine the fundamental jurisdictional questions, the court directed the parties to revert to the lower court for the objection to be heard afresh on the merits, preferably by a different magistrate, ordered the record separated between the two causes, and placed the file before the Chief Magistrate, Mombasa for allocation and hearing directions, with mention on 17 June 2024. No costs order was made.

Key legal issues

#
01

State of the record of appeal

Holding

The appeal could not be determined on the merits because the record was mixed up between two different causes and the magistrate had addressed the wrong notice

Reasoning

The court found the record of appeal conflated the judgment in Mombasa CMELRC No. 116 of 2017 delivered by Hon. E. K. Makori with the ruling in No. 2342 of 2015 delivered by Hon. Nabibya. Further, the magistrate's ruling addressed a notice dated 3 November 2020 rather than the preliminary objection dated 29 March 2022 which was under appeal, so the appeal related to different sets of facts. The court therefore directed the parties to revert to the lower court for the objection to be addressed afresh on the merits, preferably by a different magistrate.

p. 3
02

Whether the magistrates' court has jurisdiction over WIBA claims in light of the Chief Justice's Practice Directions of 28 April 2023

Holding

Not decided; the court declined to express itself on the fundamental questions of law raised pending a proper record and the trial court being moved appropriately

Reasoning

The appellant argued that WIBA, particularly section 16, confers exclusive jurisdiction on the Director to investigate, calculate and award compensation, ousting common law remedies and the magistrates' court's jurisdiction, and that practice directions cannot override statute. The respondent argued the Gazette Notice and legitimate expectation to access justice preserved pending claims. The court found these questions 'very fundamental' but held it would lose sight of them in light of the defective record, requiring the trial court to be moved first.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A first appellate court must re-evaluate the lower court record, re-assess and make its own conclusions

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Parties to revert to the lower court and have the objections dated 29 March 2022 addressed on the merits
  2. 2.It would suffice to have a different Magistrate other than Hon. Nabibya hear and determine the preliminary objection, she having expressed herself on the notice dated 3/11/2020
  3. 3.The trial court must be moved as appropriate before this court expresses itself on the matter
  4. 4.The record to be separated from Mombasa CMELRC 116 of 2017 and 2342 of 2015
  5. 5.The file to be placed before the Chief Magistrate, Mombasa, for allocating and taking hearing directions, with mention on 17 June 2024
On appeal from
Chief Magistrate's Court, Mombasa (ELRC)
Mombasa CMELRC No. 2342 of 2015
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal from the magistrates' court to the Employment and Labour Relations Court under the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act and the Magistrates' Courts Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Jiwani Impex Limited v Ndoro (Appeal E089 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1366 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Mombasa CMELRC No. 116 of 2017 (appeal); underlying suit Mombasa CMCC No. 2342 of 2015. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/1366/eng@2024-06-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.