Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedTrade dispute ML/LD/54/9/2021· [2024] KEELRC 1311 (KLR)

Union of National Research & Allied Institute Staff of Kenya v National Museums of Kenya; Kenya Union of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers (Interested Party) (Cause E641 of 2022) [2024] KEELRC 1311 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
27 May 2024
628 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment and Labour Relations Court dismissed a trade dispute because the union skipped mandatory conciliation and re-litigated issues already decided.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Interested Party raised a preliminary objection dated 21st December 2022 against a trade dispute (ML/LD/54/9/2021) on three grounds: prematurity for want of a certificate of unresolved dispute or certificate of conciliation under section 69(a) of the Labour Relations Act, 2007; res judicata, the issues of union dues deduction and the recognition agreement having been decided in Cause 1366 of 2011, Cause 1126 of 2012 and Cause 30(N) of 2019 between the same parties; and that any dispute over the continued relationship under a subsisting recognition agreement and CBA had to be brought as a demarcation dispute under section 54 of the Act, with the respondent obliged to approach the National Labour Board under section 54(5) before engaging the claimant. The claimant countered that the alleged recognition agreement was a question of fact not law, so a preliminary objection could not resolve it. Abuodha Nelson Jorum J, however, was persuaded that a recognition agreement and CBA existed, that the issues had been litigated severally and were res judicata, and adopted Radido J's dictum on the simple-majority principle as serving industrial peace and preventing proliferation of unions. The court upheld the preliminary objection and dismissed the suit with costs on 27th May 2024.

Key legal issues

#
01

Prematurity of the trade dispute under section 69(a) of the Labour Relations Act

Holding

The objection on prematurity succeeded as part of the court's overall persuasion that the claimant could not maintain the suit, culminating in dismissal

Reasoning

The Interested Party argued that no certificate of unresolved dispute or certificate of conciliation was issued or exhibited as required under section 69(a) of the Labour Relations Act, 2007, whose terms it said were mandatory. The court, in reviewing the objection and submissions, was persuaded to uphold the preliminary objection and dismiss the suit.

p. 2
02

Res judicata

Holding

The issues in the suit (deduction of union dues and recognition agreement) were already litigated and decided in prior causes between the same parties

Reasoning

The court found that the claimant's issues had been litigated severally in Cause 1366 of 2011, Cause 1126 of 2012 and Cause 30(N) of 2019 between the same parties, and treated the fresh filing as offending the settled principles of res judicata, supporting dismissal of the suit.

p. 2
03

Recognition agreement and CBA; exclusive bargaining agent

Holding

The respondent already had a recognition agreement with the Interested Party and a CBA; any dispute over the continued relationship must follow the demarcation procedure under sections 54(5), (6) & (7)

Reasoning

The court accepted that a valid recognition agreement and CBA existed and that the respondent could not engage with the claimant without first approaching the National Labour Board under section 54(5) of the Labour Relations Act, 2007. It endorsed the simple-majority principle as promoting industrial harmony, quoting Radido J with approval.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A preliminary objection is confined to pure questions of law and cannot be used to determine factual or evidentiary matters such as the existence of a recognition agreement
  • The statutory principle of simple majority in labour relations facilitates orderly collective bargaining, prevents proliferation of trade unions in a workplace and enhances industrial peace

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objection by the Interested Party is upheld
  2. 2.The suit is dismissed with costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Jurisdiction over trade disputes under the Labour Relations Act, 2007; suit lodged as trade dispute ML/LD/54/9/2021

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Union of National Research & Allied Institute Staff of Kenya v National Museums of Kenya; Kenya Union of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers (Interested Party) (Cause E641 of 2022) [2024] KEELRC 1311 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Trade dispute ML/LD/54/9/2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/1311/eng@2024-05-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.