Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCOtherNot stated in the judgment· [2024] KEELRC 1245 (KLR)

Oyieke v Kenya National Trading Corporation Ltd (Cause E021 of 2024) [2024] KEELRC 1245 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
15 May 2024
628 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employer couldn't block an unfair termination case by pointing to internal dispute rules without proving those rules actually applied.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, Jack Omondi Oyieke, sued Kenya National Trading Corporation Ltd on 28 March 2024 for unfair termination of employment and breach of contract. The Respondent filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection on 15 April 2024 raising nine grounds: lack of jurisdiction for failure to exhaust internal dispute resolution mechanisms under its HR Policy Manual, failure to exhaust alternative dispute resolution under Article 159(2)(c) of the Constitution, ouster under Section 74 of the Public Service Commission Act and Regulation 68(1) of the PSC Regulations, 2020, defective affidavits under the Oaths and Statutory Declarations Act, non-disclosure of material facts, and abuse of process. Directions were issued for submissions, with the Respondent to file by 26 April 2024; it filed on 9 May 2024 without explanation. The Court expunged the late submissions, noting the delay frustrated the expeditious disposal contemplated by the ELRC Act and amounted to a failure to prosecute the objection. Considering the legal framework nonetheless, the Court found the Respondent had placed no material demonstrating a nexus between its disciplinary processes and the Public Service Commission or the PSC Act, undermining the section 74 objection. The Court struck out the Notice of Preliminary Objection, directed that any jurisdictional points be taken at the hearing on the merits and included in the Response, and awarded costs to the Claimant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Court lacks jurisdiction under Section 74 of the Public Service Commission Act

Holding

The preliminary objection failed because the Respondent did not demonstrate that the Public Service Commission Act applied to its disciplinary processes

Reasoning

The Respondent relied on Section 74 of the Public Service Commission Act and Regulation 68(1) of the PSC Regulations to argue that the Court lacked jurisdiction. However, the Respondent did not adduce any material showing a nexus between its internal disciplinary processes and the Public Service Commission or the Act. The Court also noted an assumption that the PSC had appointed an authorised officer under section 74, but no evidence of this was placed before it.

p. 2
02

Treatment of late-filed submissions

Holding

The Respondent's submissions filed out of time without explanation were expunged

Reasoning

The Respondent filed submissions on 9 May 2024 despite a direction to file by 26 April 2024, without explaining the delay. The Court held that this frustrated the expeditious disposal of the Cause contemplated by the ELRC Act and that the Respondent had failed to prosecute the preliminary objection. The submissions were accordingly expunged, though the Court still considered the legal framework relied upon.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A party invoking an internal or statutory dispute resolution mechanism to oust the Court's jurisdiction must place material before the Court demonstrating a nexus between its processes and the relevant statutory framework
  • Submissions filed out of court-ordered timelines without explanation may be expunged from the record

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Preliminary Objection is struck out
  2. 2.Any preliminary legal points on jurisdiction to be taken as part of the hearing on the merits and included, if at all, in the Response
  3. 3.The Claimant to have costs
  4. 4.The Respondent's submissions filed out of time are expunged from the record
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court Act (Court's constitutive statute)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Oyieke v Kenya National Trading Corporation Ltd (Cause E021 of 2024) [2024] KEELRC 1245 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/1245/eng@2024-05-15

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.