Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedMisc Application No E009 of 2023· [2024] KEELRC 1002 (KLR)

Boru v Mengesha & 3 others (Miscellaneous Application E009 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1002 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
12 April 2024
2,771 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court confirmed it cannot extend the strict three-year deadline for filing employment claims, so waiting for a related criminal case to finish loses your right to sue.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicant sought leave to file suit out of time against her former employer's officials and Global Hope Network International, claiming unfair termination of employment in 2019 and non-payment of benefits. She anchored the application on section 90 of the Employment Act, which bars civil claims arising from employment contracts not commenced within three years, and argued that the delay was attributable to Isiolo Criminal Labour Case No. 1 of 2019, in which the Respondents were convicted and fined on 3rd July 2023. The Respondents opposed, contending that civil and criminal proceedings may run concurrently under section 193A of the Criminal Procedure Code, that the cause of action accrued on termination and lapsed in January 2022, and that section 90 contains no provision for extension of time. The court framed a single issue: whether leave to file suit out of time should be granted. Applying the Salat extension-of-time principles, the court found the Applicant had not given a reasonable explanation for the delay, since nothing bars a civil claim from running parallel to criminal proceedings. Relying on Rift Valley Railways v Musonye and Divecon v Samani, the court held that where a statute limits time for bringing an action, no court may extend it unless the statute itself allows, and that section 90's three-year period admits no extension. The Originating Summons was dismissed, with the court declining to award costs to the Respondents given the ex-parte nature of the process.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the court has discretion to grant leave to file suit out of time under section 90 of the Employment Act

Holding

No - section 90 is mandatory and admits no extension after three years

Reasoning

The court applied the Salat extension-of-time principles but found the threshold of a reasonable explanation for delay unmet. It held that a pending criminal case over the same dispute does not suspend the limitation period, since civil and criminal proceedings may run concurrently. It further held that where a statute fixes a limitation period without an extension mechanism, no court may extend it, and section 90 contains no such mechanism.

p. 6
02

Whether the pendency of Isiolo Criminal Labour Case No. 1 of 2019 constituted a reasonable/excusable reason for the delay

Holding

No - the delay was not excusable

Reasoning

Relying on the Njoroge v Kimani definition of excusable delay as unforeseeable delay beyond a party's control, the court found the Applicant's reliance on the criminal case unconvincing because nothing prevented her from filing the civil suit concurrently with the criminal proceedings. The cause of action was therefore not held in abeyance pending the criminal outcome.

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a statute limits time for bringing an action, no court has power to extend that time unless the statute itself allows extension
  • Section 90 of the Employment Act does not provide room for extension of time after the three-year limitation period lapses
  • Criminal proceedings founded on the same dispute do not suspend the limitation period for a civil employment claim

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Originating Summons dated 29th September 2023 is dismissed
  2. 2.No costs awarded to the Respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Actsection 90
  • Limitations of Actions ActPart III; sections 27, 28
  • Criminal Procedure Codesection 193A; section 215
  • Civil Procedure Actsections 1A, 1B
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 162(2)
  • ELRC Procedure RulesRule 28(3)

Cases cited (22)

  • Allan Otieno Osula v Gurdev Engineering & Construction Ltd
    [2015] eKLR
  • Edith Gichugu Koine v Stephen Njagi Thoithi
    [2014] eKLR
  • Mwangi v Kariuki
    [1999] LLR 2632 (CAK)
  • Joseph Odide Walome v David Mbadi Akello
    [2022] eKLR
  • Trust Bank Ltd vs Amalo Company Ltd
    [2003] EA 350
  • Peter Kariuki Waweru v Kiambu County Government & another
    [2015] eKLR
  • Simon Wachira Nyaga v Patricia Wamwirwa
    [2018] eKLR
  • Mehta v Shah
    [1965] EA 321
  • IGA v Makerere University
    [1972] EA 65
  • Divecon Ltd vs Shirinkhanu Sadrudin Samnani
    [1995-1998] 1 EA 48
  • Willis Onditi Odhiambo v Gateway Insurance Co. Ltd
  • Haron Onyancha v National Police Service Commission & Another
    [2017] eKLR
  • Maxwell v Kiiru
    [1987] KLR 324
  • Josephat Ndirangu v Henkel Chemicals (EA) Ltd
    [2013] eKLR
  • Samson Wanyoike Kimani v Bliss Flora Limited
    [2018] eKLR
  • Maria Machocho v Total (K)
    Industrial Cause No. 2 of 2012
  • Nicodemus Marani v Timsales Limited
    [2014] eKLR
  • Samuel Kamau Macharia & another v Kenya Commercial Bank Limited & 2 others
    [2012] eKLR
  • John Kiiru Njiiri v University of Nairobi
    [2021] eKLR
  • Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 7 others
    [2014] eKLR
  • Njoroge v Kimani
    (Civil Application Nai E049 of 2022) [2022] KECA 1188 (KLR)
  • Rift Valley Railways (Kenya) Ltd v Hawkins Wagunza Musonye & another
    [2016] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2) of the Constitution (ELRC jurisdiction)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Boru v Mengesha & 3 others (Miscellaneous Application E009 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1002 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Misc Application No E009 of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/1002/eng@2024-04-12

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.