Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedMombasa ELRC Appeal arising from Mombasa CMELRC No. E007 of 2021· [2024] KEELRC 947 (KLR)

Mini Bakeries (Mombasa) Limited v Ndirangu (Appeal E128 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 947 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
11 April 2024
2,463 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Employment Court in Mombasa confirmed that proper union notice and consultation can make a redundancy lawful, and that old leave and service claims are time-barred.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a first appeal to the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa (M. Mbarũ J) against the judgment of 26 October 2023 in Mombasa CMELRC No. E007 of 2021, in which the trial court found a redundancy unfair for want of consultation and awarded the respondent severance pay for 20 years and leave pay including 2017 and 2019. The appellant, the employer, contended that notice of redundancy was issued to the Bakery Confectionary, Manufacturing & Allied Works Union on 1 April 2020, consultations followed leading to an agreement of 2 July 2020 affecting 589 employees, terminal dues were paid and a discharge voucher signed; and that severance and leave claims predating the written contract of 1 November 2011 were time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act. The respondent urged that he served 20 continuous years and was entitled to the fruits of his judgment. Allowing the appeal, the court held that as a unionised shop steward the respondent was covered by the union notice and consultations, which satisfied section 40(1) and ILO Convention No. 158 standards. Severance was properly computed on 9 years from the written contract (1 November 2011 to 30 September 2020), with only a tabulation shortfall of Ksh.749 due. Leave claims for 2017 and 2019 failed because leave cannot accumulate beyond 18 months under section 28(4) and records showed leave taken. The appeal was allowed, the Ksh.749 awarded to the respondent, and each party ordered to bear its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Consultation and notice in redundancy

Holding

The redundancy process was lawful: notice was issued to the union, consultations were held leading to an agreement of 2 July 2020, and personal notice issued to the respondent; the trial court erred in finding otherwise

Reasoning

The respondent was a unionised shop steward. The union was issued notice on 1 April 2020 and consulted on 8 April, 6 June and 19 June 2020, culminating in an agreement affecting 589 employees in the packaging department, with personal notice to the respondent. This satisfies section 40(1) of the Employment Act and aligns with Kenya Airways and Cargill and ILO Convention No. 158.

p. 4
02

Severance pay period

Holding

Severance pay should be computed from the written contract of 1 November 2011 (9 full years), not 20 years; only a tabulation shortfall of Ksh.749 was due

Reasoning

The respondent began as a casual and was converted to a written contract on 1 November 2011. Claims before that contract are time-barred under section 90. Severance at 15 days per year over 9 years at Ksh.18,606 is Ksh.83,727; the appellant paid Ksh.82,978.77, leaving Ksh.749 due.

p. 5
03

Annual leave pay for 2017 and 2019

Holding

The award for leave for 2017 and 2019 was unjustified; accrued leave cannot be accumulated beyond 18 months under section 28(4), and leave records confirm leave taken

Reasoning

Under section 28(4) an employee may not accumulate leave beyond 18 months without employer approval. Employment ended on 24 July 2020, so accrued leave was claimable only up to 2018. Records show 26 days taken in 2018 and 18 days in 2019, and the redundancy dues included leave pay, so the trial court's award was erroneous.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • Where employees are unionised, notice of redundancy must issue to the union (copied to the Labour Officer) and personal notice to affected employees, following section 40(1) of the Employment Act
  • Consultation with the trade union on the reasons for and extent of an intended redundancy satisfies section 40(1) and is in line with ILO Convention No. 158, Recommendation No. 166 Article 13
  • Claims accruing before a written contract of employment converted casual employment are a separate regime and subject to the limitation period under section 90 of the Employment Act
  • On a first appeal, the court must re-evaluate, re-assess and analyse the entire record and determine whether the conclusions of the trial court should stand

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is allowed
  2. 2.The severance pay is found under-calculated by Ksh.749 which is due to the respondent
  3. 3.Each party is to bear its own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Act, 2007section 40(1)
  • Employment Act, 2007section 49(1)
  • Employment Act, 2007section 40(1)(e)
  • Employment Act, 2007section 10
  • Employment Act, 2007section 90
  • Employment Act, 2007section 28 and 28(4)
  • ILO Convention No. 158 on Termination of Employment Convention, 1982 / Recommendation No. 166Article 13 of Recommendation No. 166

Cases cited (8)

  • Universal Education Trust Fund v Monica Chopara
    [2012] eKLR
  • Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers v Tusker Mattresses Limited
    [2021] eKLR
  • Kenya Union of Employees of Voluntary and Charitable Organisations (KUEVACO) v St Joseph Catholic Church, Jericho Parish
    [2018] eKLR
  • Daniel Mburu Muriu v Hygrotech East Africa Ltd
    [2021] eKLR
  • Abok James Odera t/a Odera & Associates v John Patrick Machira t/a Machira & Co. Advocates
    [2013] eKLR
  • Kenya Airways Limited v Aviation & Allied Workers Union Kenya & 3 others
    Nairobi Civil Appeal No. 46 of 2013 (2014) eKLR
  • Cargill Kenya Limited v Mwaka & 3 others
    (Civil Appeal 54 of 2019) [2021] KECA 115 (KLR) (22 October 2021)
  • Barclays Bank of Kenya, Barclays Africa Group (SA) Ltd vs Gladys Muthoni & 2 others
    Nairobi Civil Appeals No 296 & 301 of 2016 (2018) eKLR
On appeal from
Magistrates' Court (CMELRC), Mombasa
CMELRC No. E007 of 2021
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal from the trial court (magistrates' court) under the Employment Act, 2007

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mini Bakeries (Mombasa) Limited v Ndirangu (Appeal E128 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 947 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Mombasa ELRC Appeal arising from Mombasa CMELRC No. E007 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/947/eng@2024-04-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.