Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNakuru CMCC ELRC No. E010 of 2023 (Appeal)· [2024] KEELRC 651 (KLR)

Taifarm Millers Limited v Oduor (Miscellaneous Application 62 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 651 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
1 February 2024
3,850 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~15 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The High Court in Nakuru let a company appeal late and stopped execution of a Kshs 485,755 award, but only if it deposits the full amount within 60 days.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicant, Tai Farm Millers Limited, moved the High Court by notice of motion dated 22nd September 2023 seeking stay of execution of a judgment delivered on 13th July 2023 in Nakuru CMCC ELRC No. E010 of 2023 (Francis Nyongesa Oduor v Tai Farm Millers Limited), setting aside of a proclamation and attachments by Sanjomu Auctioneers, unconditional release of attached goods, and leave to appeal out of time against the judgment of Hon. Elizabeth Juma. The application was anchored on Order 42 Rule 6 and Order 52 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Sections 3A and 79G of the Civil Procedure Act. The Applicant blamed delay in filing the appeal on miscommunication in issuing instructions to its advocate and offered to deposit the decretal sum of Kshs. 485,755.40 in a joint interest-earning account. The Respondent opposed, contending the delay of about two to three months was inordinate and unexplained, that no security had been given, and that the Applicant had signed a consent to pay the decretal sum in monthly instalments of Kshs. 50,000 and issued post-dated cheques, showing no real intention to appeal. The court, considering the draft memorandum of appeal, found the appeal raised triable issues and, guided by the principle that an applicant should not be locked out of the justice system, allowed the application. It granted leave to file the appeal within 14 days, stayed execution conditionally, required payment of execution charges already incurred and deposit of the entire decretal sum in a joint interest-earning account within 60 days, in default of which execution may proceed. Costs were made to abide the outcome of the appeal. Ruling delivered virtually on 1st February 2024 by Hellen Wasilwa, J.

Key legal issues

#
01

Extension of time to file appeal under Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act

Holding

Application allowed despite about two months' delay; the draft memorandum of appeal raised triable issues and the applicant should not be locked out of the justice system.

Reasoning

The court noted the judgment was delivered on 13th July 2023 and the application was filed after the 30-day period had lapsed. However, the court found that the draft memorandum of appeal raised triable issues which must be laid to rest, and applying the principle of access to justice, held the applicant should not be locked out, granting leave to file the appeal within 14 days.

p. 7
02

Stay of execution pending appeal under Order 42 Rule 6

Holding

Stay granted on conditions: payment of execution charges already incurred and deposit of the entire decretal sum in an interest-earning joint account within 60 days, failing which execution may proceed.

Reasoning

Having allowed the application for extension of time, the court exercised its discretion under Order 42 Rule 6 to stay execution, but tailored conditional relief requiring security for due performance of the decree, consistent with the applicant's own offer to deposit the decretal sum, with execution resuming in default of compliance.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant should not be locked out of the justice system, and access to justice supports extension of time where triable issues exist
  • Leave to appeal out of time and stay of execution may be granted subject to conditions, including deposit of the decretal sum and payment of execution charges

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Applicant granted leave to file their appeal within 14 days
  2. 2.Execution stayed forthwith, but the applicant to pay any attendant execution charges already incurred upon assessment or agreement between the parties
  3. 3.In the interim, the entire decretal sum to be deposited in an interest earning account held in the joint names of counsel on record within 60 days
  4. 4.In default of any one of these conditions, execution may proceed
  5. 5.Costs to abide the outcome of the appeal

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 3A
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 79G
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 42 Rule 6
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 52 Rule 1
  • Work Injury Benefits ActSection 23
  • Work Injury Benefits ActSections 51 and 52
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(1)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 10
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 48
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 50(1)

Cases cited (9)

  • Edith Gichungu Koine Vs Stephen Njagi Thoithi
    [2014] eKLR
  • Kamlesh Mansukhalal Damki Patni v Director of Public Prosecution & 3 Others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Tropical Commodities Suppliers Ltd & Others Vs International Credit Bank ltd (in liquidation)
    Misc. Application No. 3379/2003 (unreported)
  • Antoine Nolfaye v African Virtual University
    [2015] eKLR
  • Daniel Chebutul Rotich & 2 Others v Emirates Airlines
    Civil Case No. 368 of 2001
  • Omar Shurie Vs Marian Rashe Yafar
    Civil Application No. 107 of 2020
  • Susan Ogutu Oloo & 2 others v Doris Odindo Omolo
    [2019] eKLR
  • London Distillers K Ltd v Philip Kipchirchir & 2 Others
    [2007] eKLR
  • Vista Holdings International Limited v Span Image(K) Limited
    [2014] eKLR
On appeal from
Chief Magistrate's Court at Nakuru (ELRC)
Nakuru CMCC ELRC No. E010 of 2023
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 3A and 79G of the Civil Procedure Act; Orders 42 Rule 6 and 52 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Taifarm Millers Limited v Oduor (Miscellaneous Application 62 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 651 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Nakuru CMCC ELRC No. E010 of 2023 (Appeal). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/651/eng@2024-02-01

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.