Lavington Security Guards Ltd v Orenge (Appeal E018 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 565 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan court upheld that a five-day redundancy notice was unfair but cut the employee's compensation in half.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Validity of redundancy where notice was only 5 days and no proof of notification of labour officer
Termination unfair; short notice violated mandatory Section 40 requirements
Section 40 demands not less than one month's notice to the employee personally and copied to the labour officer where the employee is not a union member. The notice issued on 25th September 2021 took effect on 1st October 2021, only five days later. There was also no evidence the labour officer was notified, rendering the redundancy procedurally unfair.
Adequacy of Trial Court's award of 12 months' compensation
Reduced to 6 months' salary
The Trial Court awarded maximum compensation without assigning reasons. Given the Respondent secured comparable employment and pressed claims for unpaid dues, maximum compensation was not proved; six months' salary was deemed sufficient.
Underpayment claim
Reduced to Kshs 111,384 for the non-time-barred period
Pay slips showed consolidated salary of Kshs 10,500 against the minimum of Kshs 15,141.95 for a night watchman under the 2018 Wage Order, an underpayment of Kshs 4,641 per month. Claims predating January 2019 were statute-barred under Section 90 of the Employment Act.
Legal principles established
#- The seven-step redundancy procedure in Section 40(1) of the Employment Act is mandatory and must be fully complied with
- Notice of not less than one month is mandatory before termination on account of redundancy
- Maximum 12 months' compensation must be justified on sound principles
- Underpayment claims are subject to the three-year limitation in Section 90 of the Employment Act
Court orders
#- 1.The award of 12 months' salary as compensation for unfair termination is set aside, and substituted therewith 6 months' salary for unfair termination at Kshs 90,852/-
- 2.The award of Underpayment is upheld at Kshs 111,384/-
- 3.The award on account of pay in lieu of notice is upheld at Kshs 15,141.95
- 4.The awards on account of house allowance, leave allowance and gratuity are set aside in entirety
- 5.Each party bears their own costs of the appeal; the Appellant to bear half the costs of the suit before the lower court
- On appeal from
- Trial Court (Magistrates' Court, employment cause)
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Appellate jurisdiction from the Trial Court (provision not stated in judgment)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Later judgments citing this (1)
#Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.
- Servicehub Global Enterprise v Muendo (Appeal E120 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 916 (KLR)[2024] KEELRC 916 (KLR)18 Apr 2024followed
Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Lavington Security Guards Ltd v Orenge (Appeal E018 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 565 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Appeal No E018 of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/565/eng@2024-03-14
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.