Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCOtherNot stated in the judgment (ruling in judicial review proceedings seeking enforcement of mandamus issued in these proceedings; decree in Kisumu ELRC Miscellaneous Civil Application No. E023 of 2021)· [2024] KEELRC 480 (KLR)

Republic v Vencensia Awino Kioge, Clerk County Assembly of Migori & Secretary, Migori County Assembly Service Board & another; Okong’o Wandago & Co Advocates (Exparte Applicant) (Judicial Review Application E020 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 480 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
14 February 2024
1,510 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenyan courts ruled that county governments cannot ignore payment orders by claiming lack of budget allocation, and officials may face jail for contempt.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By a Motion dated 14 December 2023, the ex-parte applicant, Okong'o Wandago & Co. Advocates, sought contempt summons against the Finance Director of the County Assembly of Migori, the Accounting Officer/Secretary of the Migori County Assembly Service Board/Clerk, and the Board members, for failure to comply with an order of mandamus issued on 20 June 2023 enforcing a decree of costs against the Board. A Certificate of Costs and a Certificate of Order against the government had been obtained, and the respondents did not deny owing the decretal sums; their explanation was lack of funds and budgetary allocations. The Court endorsed the reasoning in Hardi Enterprises Limited v County Secretary, Nairobi City County Government and the line of authority in Republic v Principal Secretary, Ministry of Defence Ex parte George Kariuki Waithaka and Ex parte Fredrick Manoah Egunza, holding that the statutory duty under Section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act to pay sums in a certificate of order against the government is not conditioned on budgetary allocation or parliamentary approval, and that lack of budgetary allocation has no place as a defence in judicial review enforcement proceedings. The Court also noted obiter remarks by Kiage JA in the National Land Commission v Tom Ojienda litigation on litigants who await court orders before paying acknowledged debts. The Court directed that show-cause summons issue to Lilian Atieno Onyango and Vincensia Awino Kionge to appear on 22 February 2024 to show cause why they should not be cited, punished and committed to civil jail for contempt of the mandamus. The respondents' irregular Notice of Appointment by a second firm was expunged. Costs were awarded to the ex-parte applicant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether lack of funds or budgetary allocations excuses an accounting officer's failure to comply with a mandamus ordering payment of a decree against a county government organ

Holding

No - the duty to pay under Section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act is not conditioned on budgetary allocation, and the Court endorsed the Hardi Enterprises holding dismissing that defence

Reasoning

The Court relied on Hardi Enterprises and the authorities it applied (Republic v Principal Secretary, Ministry of Defence Ex parte George Kariuki Waithaka, quoting Githua J in Ex parte Fredrick Manoah Egunza). Once a judgment and monetary decree are entered against the government, the only mode of execution is mandamus compelling the accounting officer, conditional on a certificate of costs and service; the statutory duty to pay is not conditioned on budgetary allocation or parliamentary approval. The respondents did not deny owing the sums. The Court found the holding persuasive and endorsed it.

p. 2
02

Whether the respondents should be cited and committed to civil jail for contempt of the mandamus order

Holding

The Court issued show-cause summons to the Finance Director and the Accounting Officer/Clerk to appear on 22 February 2024; it did not at this stage commit them or deny them audience

Reasoning

The application sought summons to show cause, and thereafter committal for six months and denial of audience. The Court granted the intermediate relief - issuance of summons - directing the officers to appear and show cause why they should not be cited, punished and committed to civil jail for failing to comply with the mandamus dated 20 June 2023. The ultimate committal was left to the show-cause hearing.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • The statutory duty imposed on an accounting officer to pay sums in a certificate of order against the Government is not conditioned on budgetary allocation or parliamentary approval; lack of budgetary allocation is no defence to enforcement of a monetary decree against government by way of mandamus.
  • Endorsement of the persuasive High Court holding in Hardi Enterprises Limited v County Secretary, Nairobi City County Government & 2 Ors that a plea of inability to pay due to lack of budgetary allocation has no place in judicial review enforcement proceedings.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Summons be issued to Lilian Atieno Onyango, the Finance Director, County Assembly of Migori and Vincensia Awino Kionge, Accounting Officer, Authorised Officer, Secretary of the County Assembly Service Board and Clerk of the County Assembly Migori to appear in this Court on 22 February 2024 to show cause why they should not be cited, punished and committed to civil jail for contempt of court for failing to comply with the order of mandamus dated 20 June 2023
  2. 2.Costs to the ex-parte applicant
Jurisdiction invoked
Enforcement jurisdiction over orders of mandamus issued by the ELRC in judicial review proceedings, and power to punish for contempt of court orders

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v Vencensia Awino Kioge, Clerk County Assembly of Migori & Secretary, Migori County Assembly Service Board & another; Okong’o Wandago & Co Advocates (Exparte Applicant) (Judicial Review Application E020 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 480 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment (ruling in judicial review proceedings seeking enforcement of mandamus issued in these proceedings; decree in Kisumu ELRC Miscellaneous Civil Application No. E023 of 2021). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/480/eng@2024-02-14

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.