Kenya Medical Practitioners, Pharmacists and Dentists Union v Nairobi City County Government & 2 others; Nairobi Metropolitan Services (Defunct) & 130 others (Interested Parties) (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E904 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 403 (KLR)
The bottom line
#The Employment Court ruled that doctors hired during Nairobi Metropolitan Services era are county employees, and cannot demand permanent contracts via a national government circular.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the 3rd Respondent's circular of 3rd August 2021 applied to the Claimant's members
It did not. The circular addressed operationalization of the superannuation scheme under the Public Service Superannuation Scheme Act, which applies only to public officers serving in the National Government, not the county public service where the Interested Parties serve.
The court found the circular required conversion of fixed term contracts only to enable eligibility for the Public Service Superannuation Scheme established under the Act. Section 2 of the Act confines the scheme to National Government public officers. The Claimant's members serve in the county public service, catered for under the County Governments Retirement Scheme Act. Relying on the KNUNN decision, the court held the circular did not and does not apply to them.
Whether the 3rd to 131st Interested Parties are employees of the National Government or the county public service
They were recruited to perform a function constitutionally devolved to the 1st Respondent and are serving and continue to serve in the county public service.
Under article 187(2)(b), constitutional responsibility for healthcare remained with the 1st Respondent despite temporary transfer to the National Government via the Deed of Transfer of Functions. The National Government, through the NMS, acted only as delegate. The recruitments by the 3rd Respondent were done under ostensible delegated authority under the Deed, not under its constitutional mandate under article 234, and the 2nd Respondent ratified the process by retaining the employees for the balance of their contractual tenure.
Whether the Respondents are obliged to absorb the Claimant's members on permanent and pensionable terms
No. Conversion or renewal of the contracts is a matter for the 2nd Respondent, in consultation with the 1st Respondent, under section 59 of the County Governments Act.
The court held that the Deed of Transfer of Functions contemplated secondment, not permanent absorption, and clause 5.7 required consultation with the 2nd Respondent on human resource matters. A circular directing absorption would exceed the 3rd Respondent's powers under article 234 and conflict with section 59 of the County Governments Act. The Handover Framework of 30th September 2022 provided for absorption only subject to vacancies and need.
Legal principles established
#- Where a function is transferred between levels of government under article 187, constitutional responsibility for the function remains with the level to which it is assigned by the Fourth Schedule; the receiving government acts only as a delegate.
- The statutory mandate for staffing County Governments vests in County Public Service Boards under section 59 of the County Governments Act; the Public Service Commission's mandate over county governments is confined to hearing and determining appeals from county public service.
Court orders
#- 1.The case is dismissed with costs to the Respondents.
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Article 162(2) of the Constitution (Employment and Labour Relations Court) - the judgment does not expressly invoke it
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Later judgments citing this (2)
#Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.
- Mukopi & 9 others v Nairobi County Government & 2 others[2026] KEELRC 2481 (KLR)22 Sept 2026
- Mukopi & 9 others v Nairobi County Government & 2 others[2026] KEELRC 2481 (KLR)22 Sept 2026followed
Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Kenya Medical Practitioners, Pharmacists and Dentists Union v Nairobi City County Government & 2 others; Nairobi Metropolitan Services (Defunct) & 130 others (Interested Parties) (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E904 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 403 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/403/eng@2024-02-29
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.