Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNot stated in the judgment as provided· [2024] KEELRC 205 (KLR)

Kitua v Kenwan Services Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Cause 1753 of 2016) [2024] KEELRC 205 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
9 February 2024
2,118 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court refused to stop execution of a costs decree, ruling that service was proven and skipping decree approval was just a technicality.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicant, the Respondent in an employment dispute, moved the Employment and Labour Relations Court by Notice of Motion dated 29th June 2023 seeking to set aside warrants of attachment issued on 22nd June 2023 and the ruling of Deputy Registrar Hon. Noella Kyanya dated 4th April 2023, which taxed the Claimant's party and party bill of costs at Ksh. 140,460. The Applicant, through its Director Eliud Kungu Ngugi, contended that it was never served with the decree, bill of costs, taxation notice or any mention or judgment dates since July 2018, and that taxation proceeded without its participation in breach of its right to a fair hearing. The Claimant opposed through a replying affidavit sworn by his counsel, producing affidavits of service showing that the taxation notice and bill of costs were served on 7th February 2023 on the Applicant's shop attendant, and the ruling notice on 29th March 2023, and demonstrating that the Director attended the hearing on 15th June 2022, cross-examined the Claimant and testified. Justice Stella Rutto found the Director was being economical with the truth, that service was duly effected as the affidavits of service were uncontroverted, and that the decree accorded with the judgment of 9th December 2022. Applying Eco Bank Ltd v Elsek and Florence Cherugut v Cheptum Murei Annah, the court held that failure to forward a draft decree for approval is a procedural technicality cured by Article 159(2)(d) where the decree matches the judgment. The application was dismissed with costs on 9th February 2024.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Applicant was served with the Bill of Costs, Notice of Taxation and Ruling Notice

Holding

The court found that service was duly effected, as shown by affidavits of service which the Applicant did not rebut, and that the Director's claim of ignorance of proceedings since 2018 was untrue since he attended the hearing on 15th June 2022

Reasoning

The record showed the matter proceeded to hearing on 15th June 2022 in the presence of the Respondent's Director, who cross-examined the Claimant and gave evidence. Two affidavits of service by Owuor Reen proved service of the taxation notice, bill of costs and ruling notice. The Applicant did not controvert these averments, so the court had no reason to doubt service.

p. 4
02

Whether failure to forward the draft decree for approval vitiates the decree and execution

Holding

No - it is a procedural technicality cured by Article 159(2)(d) where the decree conforms with the judgment

Reasoning

Relying on Eco Bank Ltd v Elsek (Kenya) Limited and Florence Cherugut v Cheptum Murei Annah, the court held that failure to forward a draft decree for approval only warrants setting aside execution if the decree is shown not to conform with the judgment. Here the decree accorded with the judgment of 9th December 2022, so the complaint went only to the manner of extraction, not substance.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Failure to forward a draft decree for approval is a procedural irregularity that does not invalidate the decree unless the decree does not conform to the judgment
  • Uncontroverted affidavits of service are proof of due service

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Application dated 29th June 2023 is dismissed with costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 159(2)(d)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 48
  • Civil Procedure Act (Chapter 21, Laws of Kenya)Sections 1A and 1B
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1

Cases cited (2)

  • Eco Bank Ltd v Elsek (Kenya) Limited & 3 Others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Florence Cherugut v Cheptum Murei Annah
    [2022] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court's supervisory and discretionary powers over its Deputy Registrar's taxation ruling; invoked Civil Procedure Act sections 1A and 1B and Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kitua v Kenwan Services Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Cause 1753 of 2016) [2024] KEELRC 205 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment as provided. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/205/eng@2024-02-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.