Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No 1277 of 2017· [2024] KEELRC 178 (KLR)

Shivachi v Kenya Institute of Professional Studies (Cause 1277 of 2017) [2024] KEELRC 178 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
8 February 2024
2,251 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that a tutor's temporary fill-in teaching did not extend his expired fixed-term contract, and he failed to prove unfair termination.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, engaged by the Respondent as a part-time tutor under a written fixed-term contract dated 11th January 2017 for one semester of three months, sued alleging that his employment was terminated unprocedurally on or about 3rd May 2017. He sought a declaration of unfair termination, one month's salary in lieu of notice, twelve months' compensation, unpaid salary for April 2017, a certificate of service, costs and interest. The Respondent admitted engaging him for one semester but denied terminating his services, contending that after the contract lapsed he only held brief for a deserted tutor until a replacement was found, and that he later absconded without clearing or accounting for a missing camera. The Respondent relied on authorities on burden of proof under sections 107 and 108 of the Evidence Act and section 47(5) of the Employment Act. The Claimant filed no submissions. The court found the semester contract ended by effluxion of time around mid-April 2017, that holding brief for a deserting tutor did not amount to renewal, and that the Claimant neither pleaded nor proved legitimate expectation of renewal. It further found the Claimant gave no evidence of when, how and by whom his employment was allegedly terminated, and failed to discharge the statutory burden of proving unfair termination. The claims for declaration, notice pay and compensation were dismissed. The court awarded only unpaid salary for classes tutored in April 2017 while holding brief, and a certificate of service under section 51 of the Employment Act, to be issued within thirty days. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs. Judgment was delivered virtually at Nairobi on 8th February 2024 by Dr. Jacob Gakeri, J.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether tutoring as a stopgap after expiry of a fixed-term contract amounted to renewal

Holding

It did not; the Claimant was only holding brief until a replacement was found

Reasoning

The one-semester contract lapsed by effluxion of time. The Claimant admitted he was stepping in for a deserting tutor only until a replacement arrived and that he was to sign a new contract but never did. He did not plead legitimate expectation of renewal. The court applied authority that fixed-term contracts are not renewed automatically.

p. 4
02

Whether the Claimant proved unfair termination

Holding

No; the Claimant tendered no evidence of when, how and by whom employment was terminated

Reasoning

The Claimant's statement made two months after the alleged termination was silent on who terminated and in what circumstances; the alleged call by the Principal emerged only on cross-examination almost five years later with no corroboration. The Respondent consistently denied termination, and under ss.107-109 Evidence Act and s.47(5) Employment Act the burden lay on the Claimant, which he failed to discharge.

p. 5
03

Entitlement to salary for April 2017 and certificate of service

Holding

Claimant entitled to unpaid salary for classes tutored while holding brief and to a certificate of service under s.51 Employment Act

Reasoning

Having found the Claimant actually tutored classes in April 2017 while holding brief for the deserted tutor, remuneration being based on Class Attendance Sheets, the court found those prayers merited. A certificate of service is a statutory entitlement under s.51 of the Employment Act.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • Fixed term contracts carry no rights, obligations or expectations beyond the date of expiry and will not be renewed automatically even where a renewal clause exists
  • The party alleging the existence of a fact must establish it by credible evidence (ss.107, 108, 109 Evidence Act)
  • Under Section 47(5) of the Employment Act the employee bears the burden of proving unfair termination

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered for the Claimant for any amount unpaid for the classes tutored while holding brief for the deserting tutor
  2. 2.Certificate of service to be issued within 30 days
  3. 3.Each party to bear its own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 47(5)
  • Employment ActSection 51
  • Evidence ActSections 107, 108 and 109
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 1B
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 48

Cases cited (7)

  • Kipkepe Ltd V Peterson Ondieki Tai
    (2016) eKLR
  • Simon Mbithi Mbane V Inter Security Services Ltd
    (2018) eKLR
  • Rajab Barasa & 4 others V Kenya Meat Commission
    (2016) eKLR
  • Stephen Kitheka V Kevita International Ltd
    (2018) eKLR
  • Registered Trustees of the Presbyterian Church of East Africa & another V Ruth Gathoni Ngotho
    (2017) eKLR
  • Mbita Ntiro V Mbae Mwirichia & another
    (2018) eKLR
  • Alice Wanjiru Ruhiu V Messaic Assembly of Yahweh
    (2021) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment Act, 2007 (first-instance claim; no specific constitutional provision invoked for jurisdiction)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Shivachi v Kenya Institute of Professional Studies (Cause 1277 of 2017) [2024] KEELRC 178 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Cause No 1277 of 2017. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/178/eng@2024-02-08

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.