Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCStruck OutELRC Appeal arising from CMELRC No. 279 of 2019· [2023] KEELRC 3440 (KLR)

Masitsa v Standard Global East Africa Limited (Appeal E164 of 2021) [2023] KEELRC 3440 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
21 November 2023
3,372 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~13 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Employment and Labour Relations Court struck out an employment appeal filed 317 days after the court's 60-day filing deadline expired, ending the worker's unfair termination claim.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a first appeal to the Employment and Labour Relations Court against the judgment of the Chief Magistrate's Court at Nairobi (Hon. Kagoni E.M, PM) delivered on 9th September 2021 in CMELRC No. 279 of 2019, which had dismissed the Appellant's claim for unfair termination. The Appellant sought to set aside that decision, arguing the trial court ignored sections 41, 43 and 45 of the Employment Act on procedural and substantive justification, and claiming outstanding salary for May–July 2017, severance pay for seven years' service, leave pay and 12 months' compensation. The Respondent filed an unopposed application dated 20th September 2023 seeking striking out of the Memorandum and Record of Appeal, contending that although the Court on 8th March 2022 granted 60 days' conditional leave to file the appeal upon deposit of the decretal sum, the Appellant filed on 21st March 2023, 317 days after the leave lapsed, without fresh leave. The Court agreed: the leave orders were unequivocal and lapsed automatically on 9th May 2022 upon non-compliance. Relying on Mae Properties, Peter Nyaga Muvake, Sino Hydro, and the Supreme Court decisions in Bookpoint and Okoiti, the Court found that an appeal filed without subsisting leave is incompetent and an abuse of process. The Appellant offered no explanation for the default, and Article 159 could not cure it. The appeal was struck out with costs to the Respondent. The merits of the termination and the remedies claimed were therefore never determined.

Key legal issues

#
01

Effect of failure to comply with conditional leave to file appeal out of time

Holding

The conditional leave lapsed automatically and the appeal filed 317 days later was improperly on record without fresh leave

Reasoning

The Court's orders of 8th March 2022 required filing within 60 days and deposit of the decretal sum, failing which the orders would automatically lapse. The Appellant filed on 21st March 2023, 317 days late, without fresh leave, and offered no explanation. Relying on Mae Properties, Peter Nyaga Muvake, Sino Hydro, Bookpoint and Okoiti, the Court held the record incompetent and an abuse of process, warranting striking out at the first instance.

p. 6
02

Whether Article 159 of the Constitution cures procedural default

Holding

Not addressed as a holding; the Court proceeded on the procedural default without invoking Article 159 to excuse the delay

Reasoning

The Respondent submitted that Article 159 cannot cure the failure to comply with the conditional leave, citing Mumo Matemu and Kakuta Maimai Hamisi. The Court, while noting the unopposed application, considered the merits and struck out the appeal; it did not adopt Article 159 to excuse the default.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • Leave granted conditionally to file an appeal out of time lapses automatically upon non-compliance, and an appeal filed after such lapse is incompetent and liable to striking out

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Memorandum of Appeal and Record of Appeal struck out as incompetent and an abuse of court process
  2. 2.Appeal struck out with costs to the Respondent
On appeal from
Chief Magistrate's Court at Nairobi
CMELRC No. 279 of 2019
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal to the ELRC under the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016, Rule 8(1) as read with section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act; leave to file out of time granted 8th March 2022

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Masitsa v Standard Global East Africa Limited (Appeal E164 of 2021) [2023] KEELRC 3440 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). ELRC Appeal arising from CMELRC No. 279 of 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/3440/eng@2023-11-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.