Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedPetition dated 4th February 2022· [2023] KEELRC 3411 (KLR)

Nyamu v Ministry of Water, Sanitation and Irrigation & 2 others (Petition E043 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 3411 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court (High Court sitting as such per judgment text)
23 November 2023
5,902 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~24 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that advisors hired to serve a Cabinet Secretary lose their jobs when that Secretary leaves office, though they still get gratuity and a certificate of service.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Petitioner, appointed as Technical Officer, Strategic Communication, Advocacy and Public Relations in the Ministry of Water, Sanitation and Irrigation on a two-year contract, challenged the termination of his employment following the resignation of Cabinet Secretary Sicily K. Kariuki on 7th February 2022. He sought a declaration that the termination breached Articles 27, 28, 41 and 48 of the Constitution, orders of certiorari and prohibition, alternative payment of dues for the unexpired term, and costs. The Respondents maintained that the position was supernumerary, created at the Cabinet Secretary's request under Regulation 27 of the Public Service Commission Regulations 2020, and that the appointment could not extend beyond her tenure. The court framed three issues: whether the petition was properly crafted, whether the term was limited to the Cabinet Secretary's tenure, and whether the reliefs should issue. It held the petition met the Anarita Karimi Njeru threshold of reasonable precision. On the substance, it found that the letter of offer and contract incorporated the Regulations, and Regulation 27(9) barred the appointment from extending beyond the requesting State Officer's tenure; the employment therefore terminated automatically upon her resignation, with no entitlement to a termination notice and no constitutional breach. The petition was dismissed on liability, but the court awarded the Petitioner gratuity of Kshs. 371,628.00 (31% of basic salary under Clause 8 of the Local Agreement), a Certificate of Service under Section 51 of the Employment Act, and interest on the gratuity at court rates. Judgment was delivered by Ocharo Kebira, J, on 23rd November 2023.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the petition met the Anarita Karimi Njeru threshold of precision

Holding

The petition met the threshold of reasonable precision; it identified the rights allegedly violated and how they were breached.

Reasoning

The court applied Mumo Matemu, emphasising precision but not exactitude. The petitioner set out the constitutional provisions and explained the manner of breach in the petition and supporting affidavit, so there was no grave procedural impropriety justifying striking out.

p. 9
02

Whether the Petitioner's term was limited to the Cabinet Secretary's tenure

Holding

Yes. By the letter of offer, the Local Agreement and Regulation 27(9), employment terminated on the earlier of two years or the Cabinet Secretary's exit from office.

Reasoning

Both the letter of offer and the contract incorporated the Public Service Commission Regulations, including Regulation 27(9), which bars an advisor's appointment from extending beyond the requesting State Officer's tenure. The Cabinet Secretary resigned on 7th February 2022, triggering automatic termination of the petitioner's contract.

p. 11
03

Whether the termination violated the Petitioner's constitutional rights

Holding

No. The termination was lawful and breached no constitutional or statutory provision.

Reasoning

Because the contract terminated automatically upon the Cabinet Secretary's resignation, there was no unfair termination and no violation of Articles 27, 28, 41, 47 or 48. No termination notice was required for a contract ended by effluxion of time or a stipulated event.

p. 12

Legal principles established

#
  • An advisor appointed under Regulation 27(9) of the Public Service Commission Regulations 2020 cannot serve beyond the tenure of the State Officer who requested the appointment.
  • Fixed term contracts lapse automatically by effluxion of time or on the occurrence of a contractually stipulated event, with no entitlement to a termination notice.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Petitioner be paid Gratuity by the 1st Respondent (31% x Kshs. 99,900 x 12) ……………………..Kshs. 371,628.00
  2. 2.The Petitioner be issued with a Certificate of Service by the 1st Respondent
  3. 3.Interest on the gratuity at court rates from the date of judgment till full payment
  4. 4.Petition otherwise dismissed as lacking in merit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya 2010Articles 10, 21, 234(2)(a), 27, 28, 41, 47, 48, 159(2)(d)
  • Public Service Commission Regulations 2020Regulation 27(1)-(13), particularly 27(9)
  • Employment Act 2007Section 51
  • Public Service Act 2017Section 45(1) and (4)
  • Human Resource Policies of the Public Service Commission, 2016Section B.20
  • Official Secrets Act (Cap. 187)oath of secrecy
  • Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21)Sections 1A and 1B
  • Appellate Jurisdiction Act (Cap 9)Sections 3A and 3B
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1

Cases cited (12)

  • Republic v National Land Commission & Another ex parte Farmers Choice Limited
    [2020] eKLR
  • Republic vs Principal Secretary Ministry of Internal Security & Another ex parte Schon Noorani & Another
    [2018] eKLR
  • Pius Kimaiyo Langat v Co-operative Bank of Kenya Ltd
    [2017] eKLR
  • Samuel Chacha Mwita vs Kenya Medical Research Institute
    [2014] eKLR
  • Commission for Human Rights and Justice vs Michelle Bibi Fondo & 2 Others
    [2021] eKLR
  • Anarita Karimi Njeru v The Republic
    (1976-1980) KLR 1272
  • Mumo Matemu v Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance & 5 Others
    [2013] eKLR
  • Kenya National Examination Council vs Republic ex parte Geoffrey Gathenii Njoroge
    [1997] eKLR
  • Richard Erskine Leakey & 2 Others v Samson Kipkoech Chamai
    [2019] eKLR
  • Council of Civil Service Union v Minister for Civil Service
    [1985] 1 A.C. 374
  • Gitirau Peter Munya v Dickson Mwenda Kithinji & 2 Others
    [2014] eKLR
  • Thorp v Holdsworth
    [1876] 3 Ch. D. 637
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 234(2)(a) and 27, 28, 41, 47, 48 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010; Employment Act 2007; Public Service Commission Regulations 2020 (Regulation 27)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nyamu v Ministry of Water, Sanitation and Irrigation & 2 others (Petition E043 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 3411 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Petition dated 4th February 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/3411/eng@2023-11-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.