Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNot stated in judgment· [2023] KEELRC 3398 (KLR)

Wachira & another v Global Alliance Africa for Africa (Cause 931 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 3398 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
8 December 2023
1,289 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

When a sole claimant in a Kenyan case dies, family must act within one year or first seek an extension of time before the court can revive the suit.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicant, Gladys Njeri Wachira, widow and legal representative of the deceased Claimant Simon Kihiko Kimani, moved the court by Notice of Motion dated 10th August 2023 seeking to set aside the orders of 18th May 2022 dismissing the Claimant's suit, to reinstate and revive the suit, to have herself substituted as Claimant, and to amend the pleadings accordingly. She explained that the Claimant died on 9th August 2021 during the pendency of the suit; that financial hardship, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, delayed her petition for a limited grant ad litem, which was only issued on 11th July 2023 in Nyeri; and that a former advocate at her advocates' firm inadvertently failed to diarize the hearing date of 18th May 2022, resulting in the dismissal. The Respondent, Thomas Derdak, opposed the application as frivolous and an abuse of process. The court found that under Order 24 Rule 3(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the suit abated by operation of law one year after the Claimant's death, that is on 19th August 2022. Applying the Court of Appeal's decision in Rebecca Mijide Mungole v Kenya Power & Lighting Company Ltd, the court held that where the legal representative is not joined within one year, an application for extension of time must first be made before any application for revival or joinder; Order 24 must be read as a whole and its sequence followed without short-circuiting it. Since the Applicant never sought extension of time, the application had no basis. The court dismissed the application and ordered each party to bear its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Effect of failure to substitute a deceased sole Claimant within one year under Order 24 Rule 3(2)

Holding

The suit abated by operation of law on 19th August 2022, one year after the Claimant's death, and could not be revived or the Claimant substituted without a prior application for extension of time, which the Applicant did not make

Reasoning

Order 24 Rule 3 allows substitution where the cause of action survives, but requires application within one year of death, failing which the suit abates. The proviso permits extension of time for good reason on application. Relying on Rebecca Mijide Mungole, the court held that extension of time must precede any application for revival or joinder. The Applicant never sought extension of time, so the application had no basis and was dismissed.

p. 3
02

Sequence in which Order 24 must be applied

Holding

Order 24 must be read and applied as a whole in its framed sequence: extension of time first, then joinder/substitution of the legal representative

Reasoning

Adopting the Court of Appeal's guidance in Rebecca Mijide Mungole, the court emphasized that the proviso to rule 3(2) shows that without time being extended, no application for revival or joinder can be made. The sequence must be followed without short-circuiting it; the effluxion of time causes abatement and that time must first be extended before the legal representative acquires capacity to be joined.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A suit abates automatically where a sole plaintiff dies and no application for joinder of the legal representative is made within one year; revival or joinder after abatement requires a prior application for extension of time under the proviso to Order 24 Rule 3(2)

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Applicant's Notice of Motion dated 10th August 2023 is dismissed
  2. 2.Each party to bear its own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 24 Rule 3; Order 24 Rule 4; Order 24 Rule 7(2); Order 51; Order 10 Rule 11
  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B and 3A
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 50 and 159(2)(d)

Cases cited (1)

  • Rebecca Mijide Mungole & another vs Kenya Power & Lighting Company Ltd & 2 others
    [2017] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 24 Rule 4, Rule 7(2), Order 51, Order 10 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010; Sections 1A, 1B & 3A of the Civil Procedure Act; Articles 50 and 159(2)(d) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Wachira & another v Global Alliance Africa for Africa (Cause 931 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 3398 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/3398/eng@2023-12-08

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.