Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedNotice of Motion dated July 18, 2023 (referencing Nakuru ELRC Cause No. E008 of 2020 as the related CBA review cause)· [2023] KEELRC 3375 (KLR)

Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers v Woolmatt Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E033 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 3375 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
20 December 2023
3,952 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~16 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenyan workers who benefit from a union-negotiated CBA must pay agency fees even if they quit the union, and employers must start deducting within 30 days.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant union moved the Court by Notice of Motion dated July 18, 2023 seeking interim orders compelling the respondent employer to commence deduction and remittance of agency fees from unionisable employees who are not union members, and to comply with Legal Notice No. 112 issued on May 26, 2022 by the Cabinet Secretary for Labour. The union explained that a recognition agreement and CBA (2017-2019) existed, that all unionisable employees enjoyed the CBA benefits, but only members paid subscriptions; following its request of March 10, 2022, the Cabinet Secretary gazetted the agency fee order. The respondent opposed, asserting the CBA expired on April 30, 2019, that employees had withdrawn membership en masse, formed an Employee Welfare Association, and negotiated their own benefits; it had also applied to the National Labour Board on June 27, 2023 to revoke the recognition agreement, and urged that compelling agency fees would infringe employees' freedom of association under article 36(2) and amount to unfair labour practice. Both sides filed written submissions relying on authorities on sections 48 and 49 of the Labour Relations Act. The court, Wasilwa J, framed the matter as concerning agency fees under section 49, noted the applicant's request had been granted and gazetted, and held that employees need not be union members to owe agency fees so long as they benefit from the negotiated CBA. Under section 49(3) the respondent was obligated to deduct and remit within 30 days of receiving the Minister's notice. The court found the application merited, allowed it, directed interim deduction and remittance of agency fees pending the hearing and determination of the claim, directed compliance with Legal Notice No. 112, and ordered costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the gazetted Legal Notice No. 112 obliges the respondent to deduct agency fees from non-member unionisable employees despite their withdrawal of union membership

Holding

Yes - the applicant's request was granted and gazetted; section 49 obliges deduction from non-members benefitting from the CBA, and the respondent was to commence within 30 days of receiving the notice.

Reasoning

The court examined section 49 of the Labour Relations Act which permits a union with a registered CBA to request the Minister to order deduction of agency fees from unionisable employees covered by the agreement who are not members. The applicant made such a request and the Cabinet Secretary granted it via Legal Notice No. 112. Under section 49(3), the employer must commence deduction within thirty days of receiving the Minister's notice. Employee withdrawal of membership does not defeat the obligation, since section 49(5) makes even resigning members immediately liable to agency fee deduction. The court found the application merited at the interlocutory stage.

p. 8
02

Whether the employees' withdrawal of membership and formation of a welfare association defeats the agency fee deduction

Holding

No - the court did not accept this as a ground to withhold compliance; benefit from the CBA is what triggers agency fees.

Reasoning

The respondent argued the employees withdrew membership en masse and formed an Employee Welfare Association, so deduction would be punitive and amount to unfair labour practice infringing article 36(2) rights. The court held that agency fees do not require union membership; entitlement rests on benefit from the negotiated CBA terms. Notably the court did not expressly resolve the claim that employees no longer benefit from the expired CBA, nor the pending application before the National Labour Board to revoke the recognition agreement, instead directing interim compliance pending full hearing.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • Unionisable employees need not be members of a trade union to be obligated to pay agency fees so long as they benefit from a CBA negotiated by the union; the employer must commence deduction within 30 days of receiving the Minister's notice under section 49(3).

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Interim orders directing the respondent to commence deduction and remittance of agency fees by the respondent for the unionisable employees benefiting from the CBA negotiated, pending the hearing and determination of the claim
  2. 2.The respondent directed to comply with Legal Notice No. 112 issued on May 26, 2022 by the Cabinet Secretary for Labour
  3. 3.Costs in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment and Labour Relations Court ActSection 12
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007Section 49 (incl. 49(1), 49(3))
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007Section 59
  • Employment & Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules 2016Rule 17
  • Legal Notice No. 112 (Cabinet Secretary for Labour, May 26, 2022)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 36(2)
  • Employment Act

Cases cited (10)

  • Kenya Aviation Workers Union v Bollore Africa Logistics
    [2016] eKLR
  • Nairobi Petition No. E002 of 2022 (Justice Dr. Jacob Gakeri)
  • Samwa City of Tshwane and Municipal City of Tshwane
    Case No. J877/13
  • Union of Kenya Civil Servants v Kenya Medical Research Institute & another
    [2022] eKLR
  • Amalgamated Union of Kenya Metal Workers v Unity Auto Garage (NRB) Ltd
    [2014] eKLR
  • Tailor and Textile Workers Union v New Wide Garments Kenya (EPZ) Ltd
  • Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union v Attorney General & 6 others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Rift Valley Railway Workers Union v Rift Valley Railways Kenya Limited and another
    [2014] eKLR
  • Kenya Union of Entertainment and Music Industry Employees v Bomas of Kenya Limited
    [2017] eKLR
  • Kenya Union of Special Needs Education Teachers v Teachers Service Commission
    [2019] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2016; section 49 of the Labour Relations Act, 2007; rule 17 of the Employment & Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers v Woolmatt Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E033 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 3375 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Notice of Motion dated July 18, 2023 (referencing Nakuru ELRC Cause No. E008 of 2020 as the related CBA review cause). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/3375/eng@2023-12-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.