Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedNot stated in judgment· [2023] KEELRC 3324 (KLR)

Alwanga v Cedar Springs Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Cause 1600 of 2016) [2023] KEELRC 3324 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
21 December 2023
1,839 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court set aside a default judgment because the company was never properly served, giving it 35 days to file its defence.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Respondent, a management company for Cedar Springs Apartments, moved the Employment and Labour Relations Court by Notice of Motion dated 18th May 2023 seeking to set aside a default judgment entered on 16th December 2021 in an employment claim, together with a stay of execution, cross-examination of the process server and unconditional leave to defend. It averred it was never served with pleadings or the 10-day notice of entry of judgment, learned of the suit only on receipt of a Notice of Taxation on 26th January 2023, and never had a director or managing director named 'Vivian' upon whom the process server, John Omundanga, deponed service was effected. The Claimant opposed, asserting proper service on 20th September 2016 and that the draft defence raised no triable issues. Framing two issues - whether the judgment was irregular and whether it should be set aside - the court applied Order 5 rule 3(a) of the Civil Procedure Rules and rule 12 of the ELRC Rules, which require service on a corporation to be first effected on its secretary, director or principal officer. Since the Claimant never clarified 'Vivian's' identity or position, the court held service improper, rendering the ex parte judgment irregular. Relying on Babs Security Services Ltd and the James Kanyiita Nderitu regular/irregular distinction, an irregular default judgment is set aside ex debito justitiae as of right, without regard to triable issues or delay. The application was allowed and the Respondent given 35 days to file its defence, failing which the judgment would stand and execution would proceed.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the default judgment of 16th December 2021 was irregularly entered for want of proper service on the corporate Respondent

Holding

Yes - service on 'Vivian', who was neither a director nor principal officer of the company, breached Order 5 rule 3(a) of the Civil Procedure Rules and rule 12 of the ELRC Rules, rendering the ex parte judgment irregular.

Reasoning

The court applied Order 5 rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules and rule 12 of the ELRC Rules, which require service on a corporation to be effected on the secretary, director or principal officer. The process server deponed that he served 'Vivian', said to be a managing director, but the Respondent averred it never had such a director. The Claimant did not clarify Vivian's identity or position, and the process server should have been introduced by the Claimant to company officials. Service therefore failed to meet the statutory requirement, condemning the Respondent unheard.

p. 4
02

Whether an irregular default judgment should be set aside without regard to triable issues or delay

Holding

Yes - an irregular default judgment is set aside ex debito justitiae, as a matter of right; the court need not consider triable issues or inordinate delay.

Reasoning

Relying on Babs Security Services Ltd v Mwarua Yawa Nzao, which quoted James Kanyiita Nderitu v Marios Philotas Ghikas, the court drew the distinction between regular and irregular default judgments. Where a defendant was not properly served, the judgment is set aside as of right because the party was condemned without notice of the allegations or an opportunity to be heard. Considerations of triable issues and delay apply only to regular default judgments.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Service on a corporation must first be effected on the secretary, director or other principal officer; improper service renders an ex parte default judgment irregular and it must be set aside as of right.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Respondent's Notice of Motion dated 18th May 2023 is allowed
  2. 2.The default judgment entered on 16th December 2021 is set aside as an irregular judgment
  3. 3.The Respondent is allowed to file its defence within 35 days, failing which the judgment will be upheld and execution will proceed
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court over an employment claim; application under Order 10 rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Alwanga v Cedar Springs Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Cause 1600 of 2016) [2023] KEELRC 3324 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/3324/eng@2023-12-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.