Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNot stated in the judgment (ELRC cause; Notice of Motion dated 3rd October 2023)· [2023] KEELRC 3251 (KLR)

Kenya Hotels & Allied Workers Union v Oak Place Hotel; Akolo Wanyanga & Co Advocates (Intended Interested Party) (Cause 394 of 2018) [2023] KEELRC 3251 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
7 December 2023
901 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Employment Court refused to let a union join its former advocate or stop taxation of costs, ruling the case was closed.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By a Notice of Motion dated 3rd October 2023, the Claimant Union sought joinder of Akolo Wanyanga & Co Advocates as an interested party, a stay of taxation of a Party and Party Bill of Costs dated 22nd February 2021, and striking out of that Bill. The Claimant contended that judgment had been entered in its favour by Makau J on 5th February 2021 for Kshs. 1,613,500; that John Simiyu, the former 2nd Deputy Secretary General, had lost his position in the June 2021 Union elections and had caused the file to disappear and unprocedurally instructed the advocate firm; and that the Union never instructed the firm, whose purported instructions were fraudulently obtained. Tecla Musimbi Mativa, one of the Grievants, replied that the firm was duly instructed under Rule 3.7 Article X(f) of the Union Constitution and that the Grievants had resigned and were entitled to choose their representative. The Court noted its own ex tempore ruling of 31st May 2023 in which it had declared itself functus officio having delivered judgment. It held that seeking joinder of a third party at this stage amounted to an attempt to re-open a closed matter; that Mativa's replying affidavit was irregular and incompetent as he was not a party; and that the dispute over instructions was an ancillary dispute to be handled as such. The application was declined with each party bearing their own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether joinder of a third party can be granted after the Court has rendered itself functus officio

Holding

The application for joinder was refused as it sought to re-open a closed matter

Reasoning

The Court had on 31st May 2023 declared itself functus officio having delivered judgment on 5th February 2021. An application to join a third party at this stage would, in effect, re-open the concluded matter, which the functus officio doctrine forbids. The joinder application therefore could not stand.

p. 3
02

Whether the replying affidavit of Tecla Musimbi Mativa was competent

Holding

It was irregular and incompetent because he was not a party to the proceedings

Reasoning

Mativa described himself as one of the Grievants and deponed on the instruction of the advocate firm, but he was not a party to the cause. An affidavit from a non-party on such matters cannot properly be relied upon in the application.

p. 3
03

Whether the alleged lack of instructions to Akolo Wanyanga & Co Advocates warranted striking out the Bill of Costs

Holding

The dispute as to instructions is an ancillary dispute to be handled as such, and the application was declined

Reasoning

The Claimant argued that the advocate acted without instructions obtained fraudulently by the former 2nd Deputy Secretary General. The Court did not determine the instruction question on its merits, holding it to be an ancillary dispute requiring separate handling rather than determination within this application.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Once a court has delivered judgment and fully rendered itself, it becomes functus officio and cannot entertain applications that would effectively re-open the concluded matter
  • A replying affidavit sworn by a person who was not a party to the proceedings is irregular and incompetent

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Claimant's application dated 3rd October 2023 is declined
  2. 2.Each party will bear their own costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Original and inherent jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court over its own proceedings (no specific provision cited)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Hotels & Allied Workers Union v Oak Place Hotel; Akolo Wanyanga & Co Advocates (Intended Interested Party) (Cause 394 of 2018) [2023] KEELRC 3251 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Not stated in the judgment (ELRC cause; Notice of Motion dated 3rd October 2023). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/3251/eng@2023-12-07

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.