Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedELRC Cause E458 of 2022 and ELRC Cause E378 of 2023 (Nairobi) - consolidated; lead file E378 of 2023· [2023] KEELRC 3221 (KLR)

Esevwe v University of Nairobi (Cause E458 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 3221 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
7 December 2023
1,267 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court consolidated two University of Nairobi pay disputes, ruling a pending appeal doesn't block consolidation unless proceedings are formally stayed.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, Frank Esevwe, filed a notice of motion dated August 28, 2023 under sections 3A and 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 11 rule 3(h) of the Civil Procedure Rules seeking consolidation of Nairobi ELRC Cause E458 of 2022 and ELRC Cause E378 of 2023, together with directions and costs in the consolidated action. The application was supported by affidavits of Frank Esevwe and Omer Maurice Owino on the grounds that both suits raised similar questions of law and fact and consolidation would avoid multiplicity and duplication. The University of Nairobi opposed through a replying affidavit of Deputy Registrar Harrison Shimanyi Akala, arguing that the claims arise from a judgment of May 19, 2022 in Frank Esevwe & 57 others v University of Nairobi, that a res judicata preliminary objection was dismissed on August 4, 2023, that a notice of appeal was filed on August 9, 2023 with a live appeal pending, and that pursuing an appeal alongside consolidation was an abuse of process. The Court framed two issues: whether the suits could be consolidated as arising from the same transaction, and whether the pending appeal barred consolidation. It held that both suits concern the same cause of action - the June 21 and 22, 2022 letters reducing house allowance - and that the respondent had not rebutted the applicant's case. It further held that absent a stay of proceedings, a preferred appeal does not bar consolidation. The application was allowed: the suits were consolidated with E378 of 2023 as the lead file, to be heard in the Claims and Labour Relations Division, with costs of the application in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether consolidation is merited where the suits share the same cause of action and facts

Holding

Consolidation was granted because the two suits concern the same cause of action arising from the letters dated June 21 and 22, 2022 reducing house allowance, and the respondent did not rebut the applicant's case

Reasoning

The Court found that the two suits concern the same cause of action, namely the letters of June 21, 2022 and June 22, 2022 reducing the claimants' house allowance pursuant to a court order said to be non-existent. Consolidation would avoid inconsistent findings or judgments, promote judicial efficiency, and serve convenience and fairness. Since the respondent filed no material to rebut the applicant's case, the applicant was held to have established a case for consolidation.

p. 3
02

Whether a pending appeal bars an order for consolidation absent a stay of proceedings

Holding

No - the respondent's preferred appeal against the August 4, 2023 ruling does not operate as a bar in absence of an order staying proceedings

Reasoning

The respondent argued that pursuing a Court of Appeal process alongside High Court consolidation was an abuse of process. The Court held that without an order staying the proceedings, a preferred appeal does not bar an order for consolidation, especially where the preconditions for consolidation are satisfied. The Court accordingly proceeded to consolidate the suits notwithstanding the notice of appeal filed on August 9, 2023.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Suits may be consolidated where they raise issues for determination arising out of the same transaction
  • An appeal against a ruling does not bar consolidation in the absence of an order staying proceedings

Court orders

#
  1. 1.That ELRC Cause E458 of 2022 and ELRC Cause E378 of 2023 both at Nairobi are hereby consolidated with the lead file being E378 of 2023
  2. 2.That Cause E378 of 2023 shall be the lead file and the suits as consolidated shall be heard and determined before the Court E378 of 2023 is allocated in the Claims and Labour Relations Division
  3. 3.Parties to take appropriate steps in view of the foregoing orders (1) and (2)
  4. 4.The costs of the application in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Act (cap 21)section 3A
  • Civil Procedure Act (cap 21)section 63(e)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 11 rule 3(h)
  • Employment Actsection 31
  • Regulation of Wages (General) (Amendment) Order
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent jurisdiction under section 3A and 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act (cap 21) and Order 11 rule 3(h) of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Esevwe v University of Nairobi (Cause E458 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 3221 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). ELRC Cause E458 of 2022 and ELRC Cause E378 of 2023 (Nairobi) - consolidated; lead file E378 of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/3221/eng@2023-12-07

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.