Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCStruck OutNot stated in the judgment (Judicial Review Application by Notice of Motion dated 18th September 2023)· [2023] KEELRC 3158 (KLR)

Republic v Secretary,Bungoma County Public Service Board & 2 others; Munyapara (Exparte Applicant) (Judicial Review E002 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 3158 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
29 November 2023
3,758 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~15 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Ex Parte Applicant, a county employee living with disability, obtained leave on 16th August 2023 to institute judicial review proceedings seeking prerogative orders of prohibition, certiorari and mandamus against the county Respondents. By Notice of Motion dated 18th September 2023 he sought interim orders restraining violation of his rights, reinstatement of his salary stopped from April 2023, and his reinstatement and assignment as meat grader/senior manager at the Webuye slaughter house, complaining that his salary was stopped without notice or disciplinary process and that he was never deployed despite qualifications. The Respondents filed grounds of opposition and a preliminary objection contending that the court lacked jurisdiction by virtue of section 77 of the County Governments Act and section 87 of the Public Service Commission Act, which require grievances against County Public Service Board decisions to be appealed to the Public Service Commission. The court directed the objection be canvassed first by written submissions. The Applicant argued that section 77 was permissive, that his complaint concerned fair administrative action under Article 47, and relied on Abdikadir Suleiman v County Government of Isiolo. Holding that jurisprudence had evolved since Abdikadir and that section 87(2) of the Public Service Commission Act renders exhaustion of the Commission's appellate process mandatory, the court found the questions of promotion, deployment, remuneration and disciplinary control appealable to the Commission in the first instance, with the ninety-day timeline extendable. Upholding the preliminary objection, the court struck out the judicial review application and, tempering justice with mercy, made no order as to costs. Judgment delivered at Bungoma on 29th November 2023 by Jemimah Keli, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Court had jurisdiction over a judicial review application challenging a County Public Service Board's decision before exhaustion of the Public Service Commission appeal

Holding

The preliminary objection was upheld; jurisdiction was invoked prematurely and the application was struck out

Reasoning

The court held that disputes relating to terms of service, remuneration, promotion, deployment and disciplinary control of county public officers fall within the appellate jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission under sections 77 and 85 of the relevant statutes. Section 87(2) of the Public Service Commission Act makes exhaustion mandatory. Jurisprudence has evolved since the Abdikadir Suleiman decision, and the Court of Appeal's Hulbhai Gedi Abdille decision requires recourse to the statutory appellate mechanism in the first instance.

p. 7
02

Whether the alleged breach of disciplinary procedure under section 76(1) and (2) of the County Governments Act took the case outside the exhaustion principle

Holding

No - even a procedurally flawed decision remains a decision appealable to the Public Service Commission

Reasoning

The applicant argued that the stopping of his salary before a disciplinary hearing breached section 76 of the County Governments Act and thus fell outside the exhaustion doctrine. The court held that the propriety of the decision-making process does not oust the Commission's appellate jurisdiction; questions of merit and process alike are for the Commission in the first instance.

p. 7
03

Whether the time limit for appealing to the Public Service Commission barred the applicant

Holding

The ninety-day timeline is extendable under section 86(2) of the Public Service Commission Act

Reasoning

The court noted that any concern about the ninety-day filing period was not fatal, since the Commission may entertain out-of-time appeals where circumstances warrant, so the applicant still had an effective alternative forum.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a clear statutory dispute resolution mechanism exists, it must be exhausted before resorting to the court process
  • Section 87(2) of the Public Service Commission Act renders exhaustion of the Public Service Commission appeal process mandatory, notwithstanding the apparently optional wording of section 77 of the County Governments Act
  • Decisions of a County Public Service Board on promotion, deployment, remuneration and disciplinary control, even if allegedly procedurally flawed, are appealable to the Public Service Commission in the first instance

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Preliminary Objection filed in Court on 6th September 2023 is upheld for failure to exhaust the appeal mechanism before the Public Service Commission
  2. 2.The Judicial Review Application dated 18th September 2023 together with all the applications therein is struck out
  3. 3.No order as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActOrder 53 Rule 3(1)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1, rule 9
  • County Governments Actsection 77 (including 77(1))
  • County Governments Actsection 59(1)(b)
  • County Governments Actsection 76(1) and (2)
  • Public Service Commission Actsection 87(2)
  • Public Service Commission Actsection 85
  • Public Service Commission Actsection 86(2)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Actsection 12
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 162(2)(b)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 47
  • Constitution of KenyaArticles 10 and 232
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 234(2)(i)

Cases cited (8)

  • Samuel Kamau Macharia & another v Kenya Commercial Bank Limited
    (2012) eKLR
  • Hussein Wanyama Mulebo & 5 others v County Public Service Board & 2 others
    (2022) eKLR
  • Ismael Noo Onyango & another v Siaya County Public Service Board and another
    (2018) eKLR
  • Secretary of County Public Service Board and Another v Hulbhai Gedi Abdulla
    (2017) eKLR
  • Secretary County Public Service Board & another v Hulbhai Gedi Abdile
    [2016] eKLR
  • Speaker of the National Assembly v James Njenga Karume
    (1992) eKLR
  • Abdikadir Suleiman v County Government of Isiolo & Another
    (2015) eKLR
  • Republic v National Environment Management Authority
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act (jurisdiction contested under section 77 County Governments Act and section 87 Public Service Commission Act)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v Secretary,Bungoma County Public Service Board & 2 others; Munyapara (Exparte Applicant) (Judicial Review E002 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 3158 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Not stated in the judgment (Judicial Review Application by Notice of Motion dated 18th September 2023). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/3158/eng@2023-11-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.