Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedPreliminary Objection dated July 10, 2023 in Claim dated December 1, 2021· [2023] KEELRC 3122 (KLR)

Kenya Shipping, Clearing Freight Logistics and Warehouses Workes Union v Vegpro (K) Ltd VP Group (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E1031 of 2021) [2023] KEELRC 3122 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
24 November 2023
1,160 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed that unions can sue for employees even without a recognition agreement, and employers cannot kill such claims before trial.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The respondent filed a preliminary objection dated July 10, 2023 against the claimant union's claim dated December 1, 2021, contending that under section 54 of the Labour Relations Act, 2007, a union without a recognition agreement with an employer has no legal mandate to represent that employer's employees or to commence suit on their behalf, and that the claim was therefore incompetent, defective and an abuse of court process for want of locus standi. The claimant submitted that the objection raised contested factual positions unsuitable for determination as a preliminary point and that a union does not require a recognition agreement or collective bargaining agreement to represent its members in court, representation being a constitutional right. Applying Mukhisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd and Kepher Oguwi Langi v KUPPET, the court reiterated that a preliminary objection must raise a pure point of law on uncontested facts. The court observed that union members are entitled to representation by their union even absent a collective bargaining agreement, but membership must be proved by evidence, a question not amenable to determination on a preliminary objection. Holding that the grounds were contested and not pure points of law, the court dismissed the preliminary objection with costs in the cause. Judgment was delivered virtually in Nairobi on November 24, 2023 by Anna Ngibuini Mwaure, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a union without a recognition agreement under section 54 of the Labour Relations Act lacks locus standi to file a claim on behalf of employees

Holding

No - the objection fails because whether grievants are members of the union is a factual question not amenable to determination on a preliminary objection

Reasoning

The court noted that members of a union are entitled to representation by that union even absent a collective bargaining agreement, but membership must be proved by evidence. Relying on Kenya Shoe and Leather Workers Union v Moderd Soap Factory, the question of membership is not suitable for determination as a preliminary point. Since the grounds are contested, the issues must be litigated at the hearing of the main suit.

p. 2
02

Whether the preliminary objection meets the threshold of a pure point of law

Holding

No - the grounds are contested and require interrogation of evidence

Reasoning

Applying Mukhisa Biscuit and Kepher Oguwi Langi, a preliminary objection must rest on uncontested facts and pure points of law. The claimant contested the grounds, asserting representation is a constitutional right not dependent on a recognition agreement. The court therefore held the issues must be argued in detail during the hearing of the main suit and dismissed the objection.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A preliminary objection must raise a pure point of law on assumed pleaded facts and cannot be raised where facts must be ascertained or judicial discretion exercised
  • A recognised collective bargaining agreement is not a prerequisite for a union to represent members in court; the members must prove membership, a question requiring evidence

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objection dated July 10, 2023 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs will be in the cause
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act; Constitution Articles 159(2)(d) and 48 referenced on procedure

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Shipping, Clearing Freight Logistics and Warehouses Workes Union v Vegpro (K) Ltd VP Group (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E1031 of 2021) [2023] KEELRC 3122 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Preliminary Objection dated July 10, 2023 in Claim dated December 1, 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/3122/eng@2023-11-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.