Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedNot stated in judgment (arising from Milimani CMEL No. E234 of 2021)· [2023] KEELRC 3074 (KLR)

Chandarana Supermarket Limited v Edward (Miscellaneous Application E111 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 3074 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
28 November 2023
1,772 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employment court allowed a late appeal and paused enforcement of a Kshs 325,992 unfair termination award, provided the money is deposited in court within 30 days.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicant, a judgment debtor in Milimani CMEL No. E234 of 2021, applied under section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act and section 12(3) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act for leave to file a memorandum of appeal out of time and for a stay of execution of the judgment and decree of Hon. Hosea Ng'ang'a delivered on 6th April 2023, by which the Respondent was awarded Kshs 325,992.75 for unfair termination. The Applicant's advocate averred that he inadvertently failed to diarize the judgment date, taken by consent, and only learnt of the judgment on 29th May 2023 upon receipt of a demand letter threatening execution. The Respondent opposed, arguing the 30-day statutory window had lapsed, the appeal was not arguable, and the Respondent was a man of means able to refund the decretal sum, so the appeal would not be rendered nugatory. The court applied the Thuita Mwangi factors and found the delay of less than a month not inordinate and adequately explained, and that the draft memorandum raised arguable grounds, particularly on compensation. On stay, the court applied Order 42 rule 6(2) and the substantial-loss standard in James Wangalwa. It held it would be prejudicial to the Applicant if the appeal succeeded without a stay. The court allowed the appeal to be filed out of time and stayed execution conditional on the Applicant depositing the decretal sum in court within 30 days. Costs were ordered to abide the outcome of the appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Extension of time to file appeal under section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act

Holding

The delay of less than a month was not inordinate and was explained; leave to file the appeal out of time was granted

Reasoning

The court applied the Thuita Mwangi factors: period of delay, reason for delay, arguability and prejudice. Judgment was delivered on 6th April 2023; counsel missed it by inadvertent failure to diarize and learned of it on 29th May 2023. The 30 days lapsed on 6th May 2023 and the application was filed on 2nd June 2023 - a short, explained delay. The draft memorandum raised arguable grounds, especially on compensation, and courts discourage turning away litigants who come within a reasonable time.

p. 3
02

Stay of execution pending appeal under Order 42 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Holding

Stay granted on condition that the applicant deposits the decretal sum in court within 30 days

Reasoning

The court applied the twin conditions of substantial loss and security, and the requirement of no unreasonable delay. Having allowed the appeal to be filed out of time, refusal of stay would prejudice the applicant if the appeal succeeded; a stay would avoid rendering the appeal nugatory. The stay was made conditional on a deposit of the decretal sum as security, satisfying Order 42 rule 6(2)(b).

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • An appeal may be admitted out of time if the appellant shows good and sufficient cause for the delay
  • Substantial loss is not established merely by the fact that execution has been put in motion
  • Courts discourage turning away a litigant unheard who approaches the court within a reasonable time

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Applicant is allowed to file the appeal out of time
  2. 2.Stay of execution of the judgment and decree of 6th April 2023 granted pending appeal, conditional on the Applicant depositing the decretal sum in Court within 30 days
  3. 3.Costs of the application to abide the outcome of the appeal
On appeal from
Milimani Chief Magistrate's Court (Commercial Courts)
CMEL No. E234 of 2021
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act and section 12(3) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Chandarana Supermarket Limited v Edward (Miscellaneous Application E111 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 3074 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Not stated in judgment (arising from Milimani CMEL No. E234 of 2021). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/3074/eng@2023-11-28

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.