University Academic Staff Union (UASU) v Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology; Ministry of Labour and Social Protection & another (Interested Parties) (Miscellaneous Case E084 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 2791 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Employment Court refused to register a university union's CBA because the parties never involved the Salaries and Remuneration Commission before signing it.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether a valid CBA existed between the parties
There was an agreement between the parties, but not an enforceable contract, since enforceability arises only upon registration
Black's Law Dictionary definitions of valid and contract were adopted. A CBA is heavily regulated by statute and becomes a binding, enforceable agreement only upon registration by the ELRC under sections 59 and 60 of the Labour Relations Act and the ELRC (Procedure) Rules, 2016. Registration incorporates its terms into individual contracts of employment under section 59(3) and makes it enforceable under section 59(5). Before registration, therefore, the document before the court was an agreement with the potential of maturing into an enforceable CBA, not a contract.
Whether the CBA was registrable despite non-engagement of the SRC
No. The CBA was not registrable because the parties, particularly the respondent public university employer, never sought the advice of the Salaries and Remuneration Commission
Under article 230(4)(b) and 5 of the Constitution and section 11 of the SRC Act, the SRC has a central role in determining public officers' salaries and benefits. The Court of Appeal in TSC v KNUT (5-judge bench) held SRC advice binding and its pursuit a constitutional procedural step. Public university employees are public officers. There was no evidence that SRC advice was sought, that the Ministry analysed the CBA, or that it complied with guidelines. Ignoring the SRC vitiated the negotiations and rendered the CBA invalid and incapable of registration.
Effect of the Ministry of Labour's objection filed late
The objection was noted but the court still found the CBA non-registrable on the evidence, since the applicant did not prove Ministry analysis and compliance with SRC guidelines
The Ministry's objection, lodged after the applicant had filed and served submissions, questioned the absence of SRC clearance and of SRC involvement in the negotiations. Although the objection came late and did not address submissions, the court independently examined the statutory and constitutional framework and the evidential record, finding no evidence of SRC engagement or Ministry analysis. The procedural lapses of the objector therefore did not assist the applicant, who bore the burden of establishing registrability.
Legal principles established
#- A collective agreement becomes an enforceable contract only upon registration by the Employment and Labour Relations Court; before registration it is a mere agreement with no force of law
- SRC's advice under article 230(4)(b) on remuneration and benefits of all public officers is binding, and seeking it is a mandatory constitutional procedural step before concluding a CBA involving public officers
Court orders
#- 1.The applicant Union's notice of motion dated April 5, 2023 is dismissed
- 2.Parties shall bear own costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Articles of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010; Labour Relations Act, 2007; Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011 and ELRC (Procedure) Rules, 2016 (registration of collective agreements under sections 57, 59 and 60 of the Labour Relations Act)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Later judgments citing this (1)
#Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.
Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "University Academic Staff Union (UASU) v Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology; Ministry of Labour and Social Protection & another (Interested Parties) (Miscellaneous Case E084 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 2791 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Miscellaneous Application (notice of motion dated April 5, 2023) - ELRC, Nairobi. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/2791/eng@2023-11-07
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.