Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedMiscellaneous Application (notice of motion dated April 5, 2023) - ELRC, Nairobi· [2023] KEELRC 2791 (KLR)

University Academic Staff Union (UASU) v Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology; Ministry of Labour and Social Protection & another (Interested Parties) (Miscellaneous Case E084 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 2791 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
7 November 2023
2,987 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court refused to register a university union's CBA because the parties never involved the Salaries and Remuneration Commission before signing it.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The applicant union, Universities Academic Staff Union, moved the Employment and Labour Relations Court by notice of motion dated April 5, 2023 seeking registration of a Collective Bargaining Agreement for the period 2017-2021 executed with Chuka University on March 17, 2020, on the ground that the parties had negotiated and concluded the CBA in accordance with the law and that the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection had unjustifiably failed to transmit it to court for registration. The respondent filed no replying affidavit. The Ministry of Labour, as interested party, objected, stating that CBAs relating to public institutions must be accompanied by Salaries and Remuneration Commission clearance before presentation for analysis, and filed SRC correspondence of 2014 underscoring that requirement. The Federation of Kenya Employers, also an interested party, was ambivalent on registration but urged the court to heed concerns of implementability and fiscal sustainability. The court framed the singular issue as whether there was a registrable CBA before it. It held that a CBA becomes a binding, enforceable contract only upon registration, and that before registration it is a mere agreement. The court, bound by the five-judge Court of Appeal decision in TSC v KNUT and Radido J's decision in Kenya National Union of Nurses, held that SRC advice is a binding constitutional procedural step in negotiating CBAs affecting public officers. Finding no evidence that the parties sought SRC advice or that the Ministry analysed the CBA for compliance, the court held the CBA invalid and incapable of registration, dismissed the application, and ordered each party to bear its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a valid CBA existed between the parties

Holding

There was an agreement between the parties, but not an enforceable contract, since enforceability arises only upon registration

Reasoning

Black's Law Dictionary definitions of valid and contract were adopted. A CBA is heavily regulated by statute and becomes a binding, enforceable agreement only upon registration by the ELRC under sections 59 and 60 of the Labour Relations Act and the ELRC (Procedure) Rules, 2016. Registration incorporates its terms into individual contracts of employment under section 59(3) and makes it enforceable under section 59(5). Before registration, therefore, the document before the court was an agreement with the potential of maturing into an enforceable CBA, not a contract.

p. 7
02

Whether the CBA was registrable despite non-engagement of the SRC

Holding

No. The CBA was not registrable because the parties, particularly the respondent public university employer, never sought the advice of the Salaries and Remuneration Commission

Reasoning

Under article 230(4)(b) and 5 of the Constitution and section 11 of the SRC Act, the SRC has a central role in determining public officers' salaries and benefits. The Court of Appeal in TSC v KNUT (5-judge bench) held SRC advice binding and its pursuit a constitutional procedural step. Public university employees are public officers. There was no evidence that SRC advice was sought, that the Ministry analysed the CBA, or that it complied with guidelines. Ignoring the SRC vitiated the negotiations and rendered the CBA invalid and incapable of registration.

p. 3
03

Effect of the Ministry of Labour's objection filed late

Holding

The objection was noted but the court still found the CBA non-registrable on the evidence, since the applicant did not prove Ministry analysis and compliance with SRC guidelines

Reasoning

The Ministry's objection, lodged after the applicant had filed and served submissions, questioned the absence of SRC clearance and of SRC involvement in the negotiations. Although the objection came late and did not address submissions, the court independently examined the statutory and constitutional framework and the evidential record, finding no evidence of SRC engagement or Ministry analysis. The procedural lapses of the objector therefore did not assist the applicant, who bore the burden of establishing registrability.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A collective agreement becomes an enforceable contract only upon registration by the Employment and Labour Relations Court; before registration it is a mere agreement with no force of law
  • SRC's advice under article 230(4)(b) on remuneration and benefits of all public officers is binding, and seeking it is a mandatory constitutional procedural step before concluding a CBA involving public officers

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The applicant Union's notice of motion dated April 5, 2023 is dismissed
  2. 2.Parties shall bear own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010article 41; article 159(2)(d); article 48; article 230(4)(b) and 5
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007sections 57, 59(3), 59(5), 60
  • Labour Institutions Act, 2007section 160(6)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011section 15(6)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016not specified
  • Salaries and Remuneration Commission Actsection 11
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 rule 1
  • Civil Procedure Act (Chapter 21, Laws of Kenya)section 1B

Cases cited (6)

  • Inter Public Universities Councils Consultative Forum of the Federation of Kenya Employers & 2 others v KUDHEIHA; Ministry of Education & 3 others (Interested Parties)
  • BIFU v Post Bank Ltd
  • Kenya Chemical Workers Union v Pyrethrum Processing Company of Kenya Ltd
  • Teachers Service Commission (TSC) v Kenya National Union of Teachers (KNUT) & 3 others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Kenya National Union of Nurses v Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital; SRC & Ministry of Labour Interested Parties
    [2015] eKLR
  • Universities Academic Staff Union v Chuka University
    Misc. E087 of 2023
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010; Labour Relations Act, 2007; Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011 and ELRC (Procedure) Rules, 2016 (registration of collective agreements under sections 57, 59 and 60 of the Labour Relations Act)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "University Academic Staff Union (UASU) v Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology; Ministry of Labour and Social Protection & another (Interested Parties) (Miscellaneous Case E084 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 2791 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Miscellaneous Application (notice of motion dated April 5, 2023) - ELRC, Nairobi. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/2791/eng@2023-11-07

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.