Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedE658/2021 (Consolidated with E657/2021 and E660/2021)· [2023] KEELRC 2641 (KLR)

Kimari v Standard Engineering Works (Cause E658, E657 & E660 of 2021 (Consolidated)) [2023] KEELRC 2641 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
19 October 2023
1,333 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Three former employees of Standard Engineering Works - Peter Kibicho Kimani (Mould Fitter), Maurice Oyiro Karakacha (Turner) and Peter Ndung'u Mbeke (Mould Fitter) - sued in consolidated claims ELRC E658/2021 (lead file), E657/2021 and E660/2021, alleging constructive dismissal after the respondent paid salaries in instalments and then stopped paying for six months, forcing them to resign on 23rd February 2021. They sought arrears, terminal benefits and compensation for unfair constructive dismissal. The respondent, through its Administration Manager, admitted non-payment of salaries and terminal benefits but attributed the default to financial difficulties caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, and contended that employees who resigned were not entitled to gratuity, while conceding the CBA contained no such exclusion. The court framed two issues: constructive dismissal and entitlement to reliefs. It found the claimants proved their entitlement to terminal benefits - six months' arrears salary, house and travelling allowances, accrued leave days and gratuity at 21 days' salary per completed year of service under Clause 28 of the CBA - on a balance of probabilities. However, it held that non-payment of wages arose from diminished business due to the pandemic, an event beyond the respondent's control, and that the resignation amounted to a mutual separation rather than constructive dismissal; the compensation claim was dismissed. The respondent's counterclaim failed for want of evidence. Judgment was entered for each claimant with specific monetary awards, interest at court rates, and costs of the consolidated suit. Delivered virtually at Nairobi on 19th October 2023 by Mathews N. Nduma, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Constructive dismissal

Holding

Non-payment of salaries due to genuine financial difficulties caused by the COVID-19 pandemic did not amount to constructive dismissal; the resignation was a mutual separation

Reasoning

The court accepted uncontroverted testimony that non-payment of wages between 2019 and 2021 arose from diminished business due to the COVID-19 pandemic, an event beyond the respondent's control. The claimants had been paid in instalments until arrears reached six months, and their resignation was within their rights. Taken as a whole, the circumstances constituted mutual separation rather than a deliberate or malicious breach entitling them to compensation.

p. 3
02

Entitlement to terminal benefits

Holding

Despite finding no constructive dismissal, the court awarded terminal benefits - arrears salary, allowances, accrued leave and gratuity under Clause 28 of the CBA - on a balance of probabilities

Reasoning

R.W.1 admitted the respondent had not paid terminal benefits including arrear salaries, and that the CBA did not exclude resigned employees from gratuity. The court therefore found the claims proved on a balance of probabilities and awarded each claimant six months' arrears salary, allowances where claimed, accrued leave days and gratuity at 21 days' salary per completed year of service per Clause 28 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.

p. 3
03

Counterclaim

Holding

The respondent's counterclaim for three months' notice of termination was dismissed for lack of proof

Reasoning

R.W.1 tendered no tangible evidence supporting the counterclaim. The court held that the requirement for three months' notice of termination could not arise where salaries were admittedly unpaid for six months, and the respondent failed to prove the claim. The counterclaim was dismissed against all three claimants.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • An employee who resigns due to prolonged non-payment of wages remains entitled to terminal benefits, including accrued leave and contractual gratuity under a Collective Bargaining Agreement
  • A party asserting a counterclaim bears the burden of proving it with tangible evidence

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered for the claimants against the respondent for payment of terminal benefits as set out in their respective Statements of Claim
  2. 2.Payment to Peter Kibicho Kimani of Kshs.3,220,179.20 comprising six months' arrears salary, house allowance, travelling allowance, 47 accrued leave days and gratuity at 21 days' salary per completed year of service for 33 years and 9 months
  3. 3.Payment to Maurice Oyiro Karakacha of Kshs.2,833,482.00 comprising six months' arrear salary, travelling allowance and gratuity at 21 days' salary per completed year of service for 25 years and 2 months
  4. 4.Payment to Peter Ndung'u Mbeke of Kshs.2,301,195.00 comprising six months' arrear salary, house allowance and gratuity at 21 days' salary per completed year of service for 25 years and 2 months
  5. 5.Interest at court rates on the awards from the time of judgment till payment in full
  6. 6.Costs of the consolidated suit to the claimants
  7. 7.Dismissal of the claim for compensation due to constructive dismissal
  8. 8.Dismissal of the respondent's counterclaim against the three claimants
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act and Labour Relations Act (consolidated claims for terminal benefits and constructive dismissal)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kimari v Standard Engineering Works (Cause E658, E657 & E660 of 2021 (Consolidated)) [2023] KEELRC 2641 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). E658/2021 (Consolidated with E657/2021 and E660/2021). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/2641/eng@2023-10-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.