Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCStruck OutCause No E046 of 2023· [2023] KEELRC 2589 (KLR)

Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions and Hospital Workers v Board of Management, Ugenya Teachers Training College (Cause E046 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 2589 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
25 October 2023
605 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Union and the Respondent, the Board of Management of Ugenya Teachers Training College, had a recognition agreement signed on 9 January 2018. On 13 June 2023 the Respondent declared the positions of certain Union members redundant, issuing redundancy notices setting out terminal benefits for 10 employees. The Union sued on 28 June 2023, stating disputes over unlawful termination on account of redundancy, failure to remit union dues and statutory deductions, and non-payment of Grievants' salaries for nine months. It simultaneously filed a Motion seeking a stay of execution of the redundancy letters, payment of salary arrears for 10 months, remittance of union dues and statutory deductions, and referral to conciliation before the County Labour Officer, Kisumu. The Respondent opposed, contesting the Union's locus standi for lack of a recognition agreement and deponing that a CBA dispute was pending before the County Labour Officer. The Court held that the recognition agreement defeated the locus standi objection; that the CBA dispute head was premature because no Certificate of Unresolved dispute or affidavit of non-resolution had been filed; and that the Union had failed to exhaust the dispute resolution mechanisms prescribed under the recognition agreement and Part VIII of the Labour Relations Act in respect of salary arrears and unfair termination. The Court accordingly declined first instance jurisdiction, struck out both the Motion and the Memorandum of Claim with liberty to return after exhausting alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, and made no order on costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Locus standi of the Union

Holding

The Union had locus standi because a recognition agreement existed between it and the Respondent.

Reasoning

The Respondent's Grounds of Opposition contested the Union's standing for lack of a recognition agreement. The Court found on the record that the parties had signed a recognition agreement on 9 January 2018, and consequently the objection to standing failed.

p. 2
02

Prematurity of the CBA dispute

Holding

The head of claim concerning the Collective Bargaining Agreement was prematurely before the Court.

Reasoning

The Respondent deponed that a dispute over the CBA was pending before the County Labour Officer/Conciliator. No Certificate of Unresolved dispute or affidavit attesting to non-resolution had been filed, so the Court could not entertain that head of the claim.

p. 2
03

Exhaustion of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms

Holding

The Union was bound to exhaust the mechanisms under the recognition agreement and Part VIII of the Labour Relations Act before suing over salary arrears and unfair termination.

Reasoning

The recognition agreement and Part VIII of the Labour Relations Act prescribe internal dispute resolution mechanisms. The Court held that invoking the Court's jurisdiction without exhausting those avenues was premature, and accordingly declined jurisdiction over the entire dispute.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A party to a dispute governed by a recognition agreement must exhaust the dispute resolution mechanisms in that agreement and under Part VIII of the Labour Relations Act before invoking the Court's jurisdiction.
  • Where a dispute is pending before a Conciliator and no Certificate of Unresolved dispute has been filed, the claim is premature.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Court declines first instance jurisdiction over the dispute
  2. 2.The Motion and Memorandum of Claim are struck out with liberty to move the Court after exhaustion of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Labour Relations ActPart VIII
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act; declined for want of exhaustion of dispute resolution mechanisms under the recognition agreement and Part VIII of the Labour Relations Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions and Hospital Workers v Board of Management, Ugenya Teachers Training College (Cause E046 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 2589 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Cause No E046 of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/2589/eng@2023-10-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.