Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment (appeal from Malindi CMELRC No. 54 of 2019)· [2023] KEELRC 2556 (KLR)

Kenya Women Microfinance Limited v Angore (Appeal E009 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 2556 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
19 October 2023
2,009 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court ruled that an employee who resigns during disciplinary proceedings cannot later claim constructive dismissal or notice pay.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a first appeal to the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa against the judgment of 5 April 2023 in Malindi CMELRC No. 54 of 2019, in which the learned magistrate awarded the respondent, a former branch manager of the appellant microfinance institution, notice pay, accrued leave days, gratuity and a certificate of service totalling Ksh. 382,027.92 on the basis that no terminal dues had been proved paid. The appellant appealed on the ground that the respondent had resigned voluntarily while under disciplinary investigation for a faulty transaction and had been paid his terminal dues. Both parties filed written submissions. The court, exercising its first-appeal duty to re-evaluate the record, found that the respondent's own pleadings admitted he tendered resignation after undertaking a faulty transaction; constructive dismissal was never pleaded; and an employee who, aware of his rights, chooses to resign during ongoing disciplinary proceedings cannot later claim constructive dismissal. The court followed authorities on loss of trust and confidence in the banking and microfinance sector, noting that a staff member whose conduct points to fraud risks termination. The court held notice pay was not due since the respondent resigned, and that leave pay and gratuity were already included in the appellant's final dues tabulation, which, after deductions for PAYE, client money and an outstanding loan, yielded a negative balance. A certificate of service remained a statutory entitlement under section 51 of the Employment Act. The appeal was allowed, the trial judgment set aside in its entirety, with costs of the appeal to the appellant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the resignation amounted to constructive dismissal

Holding

The respondent voluntarily resigned while facing ongoing disciplinary proceedings over a faulty transaction; he was not pleaded nor entitled to a claim in constructive dismissal.

Reasoning

The respondent pleaded he was forced to resign after a faulty transaction, but constructive dismissal was never pleaded. The disciplinary process was ongoing and unconcluded. Where an employee aware of his rights is given the option to resign and be paid dues or face the disciplinary process, he has a choice. Having opted to resign, he cannot turn around to assert innocence given his own admission of a faulty transaction, particularly in the sensitive microfinance sector where loss of trust is a key trigger.

p. 4
02

Whether the terminal dues awarded by the trial court were payable

Holding

Notice pay was not due since the respondent resigned; leave days and gratuity were already included in the appellant's final dues tabulation, which after deductions showed a negative balance.

Reasoning

Having resigned, the respondent was owed only his terminal dues. The appellant tabulated final salary, travel allowance, pay in lieu of leave and accrued gratuity totalling Kshs. 136,979.62, but after deductions for PAYE, client money and an outstanding loan the net payable was negative, meaning the respondent actually owed the appellant. The trial court's awards of notice pay, leave days and gratuity were therefore unjustified.

p. 5
03

Entitlement to a certificate of service

Holding

A certificate of service is a statutory entitlement under section 51 of the Employment Act, 2007 and should issue at the end of employment.

Reasoning

The court noted that regardless of the manner of exit, the Employment Act requires an employer to issue a certificate of service at the end of employment. This is a statutory requirement that survives the finding that the appeal otherwise has merit.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • Constructive dismissal only accrues where the employer has placed the employee under intolerable working conditions forcing the resignation due to the employer's conduct; an employee facing ongoing disciplinary proceedings who chooses to resign cannot later claim constructive dismissal.
  • An employee facing disciplinary proceedings who resigns retains the right to dispute the lawfulness or fairness of any termination under section 35(4) of the Employment Act.
  • Issuance of a certificate of service at the end of employment is a statutory requirement under section 51 of the Employment Act.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is found with merit and is allowed
  2. 2.The judgment in Malindi CM ELRC No. 54 of 2019 is set aside in its entirety
  3. 3.Costs of the appeal awarded to the appellant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Act, 2007Section 35(4)
  • Employment Act, 2007Section 51

Cases cited (5)

  • Coca Cola East & Central Africa Limited v Maria Kagai Lugaga
    [2015] eKLR
  • Coca Cola Africa Ltd v Maria Kagai Ligaga
    [2013] eKLR
  • Edwin Beiti Kipchumba v National Bank Limited
    [2018] eKLR
  • Family Bank Limited v Panda Co-operative Savings and Credit Society
    [2022] eKLR
  • Evans Kamadi Misango v Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited
    (2015) eKLR
On appeal from
Magistrates' Court (CMELRC), Malindi
Malindi CMELRC No. 54 of 2019
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal from the trial magistrate's court in employment and labour relations matters

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Women Microfinance Limited v Angore (Appeal E009 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 2556 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Not stated in the judgment (appeal from Malindi CMELRC No. 54 of 2019). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/2556/eng@2023-10-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.