Kenya Union of Domestic Workers, Hotels, Educational Institutions And Hospital Workers Union(KUDHEIHA) v BOM Lirhanda Girls High School (Employment and Labour Relations Cause 16 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 2519 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Employment Court dismissed a union claim for two school workers, holding both dismissals were fair and no compensation, gratuity or notice pay was owed.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether Miriam Magozi's dismissal was substantively fair
The dismissal was substantively fair and valid; witnesses before the disciplinary committee confirmed incitement and a reasonable employer would have dismissed her.
Minutes of the disciplinary committee of 22nd July 2022 recorded six witnesses who confirmed Miriam incited students and parents to strike; she cross-examined the witnesses and did not refute the allegations at trial. Applying the reasonable employer test from British Leyland v Swift, the court held the reasons for dismissal were valid and lawful.
Whether Henry Shilovele's dismissal was substantively fair
The dismissal was substantively fair; his absence from work without permission amounted to gross misconduct under section 44(4)(a),(b) and (e).
Henry absented himself from the work station from 2nd March 2021 without authority. The medical letter recommending retirement on medical grounds was not conclusive, as the decision to retire was the employer's, not his. He failed to respond to the show cause letter and failed to produce medical notes; the onus of proving his medical condition was on him.
Whether the dismissals were procedurally fair
Both grievants were accorded procedural fairness under section 41 of the Employment Act.
Both grievants were notified, invited to disciplinary hearings, attended them, were accompanied by union representatives, and were given the opportunity to question witnesses. The delay in proceedings was explained by court orders and DCI/ODPP escalation, and the PSC policy requirement of finalising disciplinary cases within six months was considered.
Entitlement to gratuity and notice pay
Neither grievant was entitled to gratuity or notice pay; no CBA existed or was produced and the Kudheiha/Ministry of Education CBA had expired.
Both grievants admitted NSSF deductions were made. The appointment letters made no provision for gratuity and did not refer to any CBA. The court took judicial notice that the Kudheiha/Ministry of Education CBA existed but had since expired, relying on Court of Appeal and Industrial Court authority, so rights were governed by the employment contracts and the Employment Act.
Legal principles established
#- An employer must prove the reason or reasons for termination; failure to do so renders the termination unfair under section 45 of the Employment Act.
- The reasonableness test: if a reasonable employer might reasonably have dismissed the employee, the dismissal is fair.
- Service pay/gratuity is not payable over and above NSSF contributions absent a CBA or contractual entitlement.
- An employee absenting himself from work without leave or lawful cause amounts to gross misconduct justifying summary dismissal under section 44(4) of the Employment Act.
- Submissions are not pleadings and parties are bound by their pleadings.
Court orders
#- 1.The entire claim fails and is dismissed
- 2.No order as to costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment disputes
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Later judgments citing this (1)
#Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.
- Njuguna v Kiu Construction Company Limited (Cause 1742 of 2015) [2025] KEELRC 3008 (KLR)[2025] KEELRC 3008 (KLR)30 Oct 2025
Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Kenya Union of Domestic Workers, Hotels, Educational Institutions And Hospital Workers Union(KUDHEIHA) v BOM Lirhanda Girls High School (Employment and Labour Relations Cause 16 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 2519 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Formerly Bungoma ELRC Cause E030 of 2022, transferred to Kakamega. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/2519/eng@2023-10-18
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.