Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment provided· [2023] KEELRC 2501 (KLR)

Aminga v Radar Limited (Cause 994 of 2018) [2023] KEELRC 2501 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
11 October 2023
2,531 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that firing a sick worker without a hearing is unfair, awarding him notice pay, leave pay and six months' salary.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, employed by the Respondent as a security guard from about 2007 at a salary that rose to Kshs 16,669 per month, claimed his dismissal on 4th December 2017 was unlawful, unfair and malicious, seeking declarations, damages of Kshs 13,134,472, continued salaries and costs. The Respondent asserted he was summarily dismissed for absconding duty from 24th October 2017, denied owing notice pay, leave or contributions, and sought dismissal of the claim with costs. At trial, the Claimant testified he was hospitalised at Zambezi Hospital, a facility the Respondent used, when dismissed without any disciplinary hearing. The Respondent's HR witness conceded he was an effective worker, that no hearing or show cause letter occurred, that the Respondent had his medical documents, and that leave forms were unsigned. The court framed three issues: substantive justification, procedural fairness and reliefs. It held the Respondent could not claim ignorance of the Claimant's sickness since it referred him for treatment and paid his bills, so absconding was not proved under section 44(4)(g); and that summary dismissal still required the notification and hearing mandated by section 41, which was not given, rendering the dismissal substantively unjustified and procedurally unfair under section 45. On reliefs, the court awarded one month's notice pay (Kshs 16,669), leave pay for nine years (Kshs 150,021) and six months' salary (Kshs 100,014) as compensation for unfair termination, totalling Kshs 266,704, plus costs and reissuance of a certificate of service, subject to taxes and statutory deductions. The larger damages claim was declined for want of proof.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the reason for dismissal was fair and justified

Holding

The dismissal was not justified; the Respondent knew the Claimant was sick and could not prove absconding as gross misconduct

Reasoning

The Respondent alleged the Claimant absconded duty for about a month. However, the Claimant was referred to Zambezi Hospital, the Respondent's facility, and his medical bills were paid by the Respondent, facts never refuted. Warning letters alleging negligence were never produced despite ten years of service with upward salary review. Absenteeism under section 44(4)(g) of the Employment Act was therefore not proved, so there was no valid and fair reason for dismissal.

p. 4
02

Whether the termination was procedurally fair

Holding

The dismissal was procedurally flawed and unfair under section 45 of the Employment Act

Reasoning

Section 41 of the Employment Act requires an employer to explain the reasons for termination and hear the employee's representations, even for summary dismissal under section 44. The Respondent's witness acknowledged no disciplinary hearing was convened and no show cause letter was issued because they could not reach the Claimant. The court rejected the Respondent's view that section 41 did not apply to summary dismissal, holding the process mandatory.

p. 5
03

Entitlement to reliefs

Holding

One month's notice pay, leave pay for 9 years, six months' salary as compensation, certificate of service and costs awarded; other prayers declined

Reasoning

Notice pay was allowed as the reason for dismissal was substantially unjustified. Leave pay was granted because leave forms produced bore no signature from the Claimant. Considering his ten years of service as a security guard with no special skills, six months' salary was reasonable compensation. A certificate of service under section 51 was to be reissued. Other prayers lacked evidential support.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • The employer must prove both substantive justification and procedural fairness before summary dismissal; absence from work known to be on sick leave is not proved gross misconduct and dismissal without notification and hearing is unfair.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.One month's salary in lieu of notice of Kshs 16,669
  2. 2.Payment in lieu of leave of Kshs 150,021
  3. 3.Six months' salary as compensation for unfair termination of Kshs 100,014
  4. 4.Costs of the suit to the Claimant
  5. 5.The Respondent shall issue the Claimant with a certificate of service
  6. 6.Items (a), (b) and (c) shall where applicable be subject to taxes and statutory deductions
Jurisdiction invoked
First-instance claim under the Employment Act, 2007

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Aminga v Radar Limited (Cause 994 of 2018) [2023] KEELRC 2501 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Not stated in the judgment provided. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/2501/eng@2023-10-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.