Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedELRC Petition No. 26 of 2018 (Motion dated 5 June 2023)· [2023] KEELRC 2366 (KLR)

Nadite & 19 others v National Police Service Commission (Petition 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 & 36 of 2018 (Consolidated)) [2023] KEELRC 2366 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
4 October 2023
547 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The ELRC cannot extend time for filing an appeal record in the Court of Appeal — only the Court of Appeal itself can, so the application failed.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu on a Motion dated 5 June 2023 by Rosina Mkakisha Maganga, the 16th petitioner in ELRC Petition No. 26 of 2018. She sought leave for Kithi & Co. Advocates to come on record, extension of time to file a Memorandum of Appeal and Record of Appeal against the Court's judgment of 7 March 2019, and that the annexed Memorandum of Appeal be deemed duly filed. She explained that a notice of appeal was filed on 19 March 2019 but her former advocate failed to file the record of appeal, and she only learnt of the omission upon visiting the registry. The Respondent, the National Police Service Commission, filed a replying affidavit but its submissions were not available on the e-filing platform. The Court granted leave to the incoming firm, holding that without it the application would be a non-starter. On the merits, however, it held that under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2010 the power to extend time is reposed in the Court of Appeal, and the applicant pointed to no express statutory provision conferring that jurisdiction on the ELRC. In any event, the Court would not have exercised discretion in her favour because she did not disclose the date she discovered the failure to file the Record of Appeal, a disclosure the Court held was necessary and material. The motion was dismissed with costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of the ELRC to extend time for filing a record of appeal to the Court of Appeal

Holding

The Court lacks jurisdiction; the power is reposed in the Court of Appeal under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2010.

Reasoning

A notice of appeal had been lodged on 19 March 2019, but the record of appeal was never filed within the prescribed time. The applicant invoked the court's discretion to enlarge time, but under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2010 that power vests in the Court of Appeal itself. The applicant pointed to no express statutory provision conferring such jurisdiction on this Court, and without express statutory clothing the Court could not exercise it.

p. 3
02

Whether the Court would in any event have exercised discretion in the applicant's favour

Holding

Even assuming jurisdiction, the discretion would not have been exercised for the applicant because she failed to disclose when she learnt the Record of Appeal had not been filed.

Reasoning

The applicant alleged she only discovered the failure to file the Record of Appeal upon visiting the registry, but did not state when that visit occurred. The Court held such disclosure was necessary and material to the exercise of the discretion, and its absence disentitled her to the extension even if jurisdiction existed.

p. 3
03

Leave for Kithi & Co. Advocates to come on record

Holding

Leave was granted in the interest of doing justice on the merits.

Reasoning

The Court observed that without such leave the application would be a non-starter, and in order to do justice on the merits granted the incoming firm leave to come on record for the applicant, before proceeding to dismiss the substantive motion on jurisdictional grounds.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • The power to extend time for filing a record of appeal under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2010 is reposed in the Court of Appeal, not the ELRC.
  • An applicant for extension of time must disclose the date when she found out that her advocate had not filed the Record of Appeal, as such disclosure is necessary and material.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Leave granted to the firm of Kithi & Co. Advocates to come on record for the applicant
  2. 2.The motion dated 5 June 2023 is dismissed with costs
Jurisdiction invoked
The court found no express statutory provision clothing it with jurisdiction to enlarge time for filing a record of appeal in the Court of Appeal

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nadite & 19 others v National Police Service Commission (Petition 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 & 36 of 2018 (Consolidated)) [2023] KEELRC 2366 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). ELRC Petition No. 26 of 2018 (Motion dated 5 June 2023). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/2366/eng@2023-10-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.