Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedCause No E095 of 2021· [2023] KEELRC 2305 (KLR)

Amalgamated Union of Kenya Metal Workers v Mohamed t/a Rizwan Metal Craft (Cause E095 of 2021) [2023] KEELRC 2305 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
21 September 2023
1,627 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employment court has confirmed that gratuity is not an automatic right—it only becomes payable if agreed in a registered collective bargaining agreement.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, a trade union with a recognition agreement covering the respondent's employees in steel fabrication and mechanical engineering, sought to conclude a collective bargaining agreement. By consent all CBA clauses were agreed save five, and after conciliation only the gratuity rate remained unresolved. The claimant asked the court to determine gratuity rates for the parties: 22 days per completed year of service upon redundancy and 20 days per completed year of service upon termination and retirement, on gross pay including house allowance. The respondent maintained that a CBA is a negotiated contract that cannot be imposed, citing Section 35 of the Employment Act, Section 54(1) and 59 of the Labour Relations Act and Article 41(5) of the Constitution, and noting it had implemented the agreed clauses including a 7% salary increase for 2020 and a further 7% for 2021. The court held that under Article 41(5) collective bargaining requires parties to 'engage' - to negotiate and agree. Payment of gratuity is purely gratuitous and is not a benefit in law unless agreed and contained in a CBA registered under Section 59(5) of the LRA, whereupon it becomes binding and effective from the date agreed. Applying Kenya Kazi Services Ltd and Bamburi Cement Ltd, the court held gratuity must be negotiated in good faith within the balance of the parties' legitimate expectations, and directed attention to Section 57(2) of the LRA (duty to negotiate contested matters in good faith) and Sections 57(3) and (4) (confidentiality and disclosure). The orders sought were declined; parties retain recognition and were left at liberty to agree gratuity in the next phase of CBA negotiations, with each party bearing its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether gratuity is payable as of right absent agreement

Holding

Gratuity is purely gratuitous and not a benefit in law unless agreed in a registered CBA; the court cannot impose gratuity rates on the parties

Reasoning

The court construed Article 41(5) of the Constitution, noting the active word 'engage', meaning collective bargaining requires involvement and negotiation. Under Section 57(1) of the LRA parties negotiate terms and conditions of service. Since the gratuity clause was not agreed, and gratuity is gratuitous, it becomes binding only once agreed and the CBA is registered under Section 59(5) of the LRA. The court declined to fix rates and directed parties to negotiate in good faith.

p. 3
02

Whether the CBA should be registered on comparison with other registered CBAs

Holding

A CBA is a negotiated document; the statutory provisions set the irreducible minimum and parties may only improve on them through agreement

Reasoning

The claimant argued no registered CBA exists without a gratuity clause at not less than 15 days per year. The respondent relied on Section 35 of the Employment Act and Section 54(1) of the LRA, contending gratuity is a matter open to negotiation subject to the employer's financial capacity. The court held gratuity must be negotiated in good faith within the balance of legitimate expectations, citing Bamburi Cement Ltd v William Kilonzi.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Gratuity is a purely gratuitous payment and is not a benefit in law unless provided for in a CBA registered with the court under Section 59(5) of the LRA
  • A collective agreement becomes enforceable upon registration by the Court and is effective from the date agreed by the parties (Section 59(5) LRA)
  • Payment of gratuity must be negotiated by the parties in good faith within the balance of legitimate expectations and rights

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Orders sought by the claimant to have the court determine gratuity rates are declined
  2. 2.The court brought to the attention of the respondent the provisions of Section 57(2) of the LRA allowing negotiations over any contested matter in good faith
  3. 3.The court brought to the attention of the claimant the provisions of Sections 57(3) and (4) of the LRA on confidentiality and disclosure in negotiations
  4. 4.Parties have liberty to engage and agree on payment of gratuity in the next phase of CBA negotiations
  5. 5.Parties enjoy recognition and each party to bear own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 35
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007Section 54(1)
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007Section 57(1)
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007Section 57(2)
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007Sections 57(3) and (4)
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007Section 59
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007Section 59(5)
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007Part VII
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 41(5)

Cases cited (5)

  • Amalgamated Union of Kenya Metal Workers v M/S Load Trailer (EA) Limited
    Cause No 1340 of 2016
  • Kenya National Private Security Workers Union v Wells Fargo Limited
    [2020] eKLR
  • National Union of Water & Sewerage Employees v Mathira Water & Sanitation Co. Ltd & 2 others
    [2013] eKLR
  • Kenya Kazi Services Ltd v Dickson Onjwaya Wasike & 42 others
    [2021] eKLR
  • Bamburi Cement Ltd v William Kilonzi
    [2016] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over recognition agreements and collective bargaining disputes (Labour Relations Act, 2007; Employment Act, 2007)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Amalgamated Union of Kenya Metal Workers v Mohamed t/a Rizwan Metal Craft (Cause E095 of 2021) [2023] KEELRC 2305 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Cause No E095 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/2305/eng@2023-09-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.