Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No. 1448 of 2016 (originally ELRC Nairobi; transferred to ELRC Nakuru)· [2023] KEELRC 2275 (KLR)

Ngesa v Keroche Breweries Limited (Cause 1 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 2275 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
28 September 2023
3,794 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~15 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court awarded a sacked brewery dispatch officer Kshs.630,000 because his employer fired him without evidence, a hearing, or a properly delivered letter.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, engaged as a dispatch officer on 3rd August 2015 at a gross monthly salary of Kshs.45,000/=, was suspended in October 2015 following an alleged fraudulent order scheme that cost the respondent about Kshs.15 million. After successive extensions, he was suspended indefinitely on 9th November 2015 and never recalled to work. He sued seeking a declaration that the indefinite suspension amounted to unfair termination, salary arrears, twelve months' compensation, leave pay, notice pay, service pay, and a certificate of service. The cause was transferred from ELRC Nairobi to ELRC Nakuru as the cause of action arose at Naivasha. The respondent relied on a letter of termination dated 8th April 2016. In evidence, the respondent's sole witness admitted there was no evidence connecting the claimant to the fraud, no duty roster, no record of losses, no disciplinary hearing, no service of the termination letter (which bore the wrong address), and no payment of terminal dues. The court held the dismissal wrongful, unfair and unlawful for want of notice and both substantive and procedural fairness under Sections 41, 43, 45 and 47 of the Employment Act, Article 47 of the Constitution and the Fair Administrative Action Act. It found the suspension ended upon the April 2016 termination decision, awarded salary arrears for seven months (Kshs.315,000/=), one month's notice pay (Kshs.45,000/=), six months' compensation (Kshs.270,000/=) totaling Kshs.630,000/=, and ordered unconditional issuance of a certificate of service within 30 days. Claims for leave pay and service pay were denied for lack of qualifying service. Costs were awarded to the claimant. Judgment delivered virtually at Nakuru on 28th September 2023 by D. Nderitu J.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the claimant's dismissal was substantively and procedurally fair

Holding

The dismissal was wrongful, unfair and unlawful - there was no evidence of misconduct, no disciplinary hearing, and the termination letter was never served

Reasoning

The court found no evidence connecting the claimant to the alleged fraud, admitted by the respondent itself. The respondent admitted no disciplinary hearing was conducted and that the termination letter bore the wrong postal address with no proof of posting or delivery. These omissions breached Sections 41, 43 and 45 of the Employment Act, Article 47 of the Constitution and the Fair Administrative Action Act.

p. 5
02

Whether the indefinite suspension amounted to unfair termination

Holding

The suspension ended when the respondent decided to terminate in April 2016; the termination was a dismissal for lack of notice

Reasoning

The court found on a balance of probability that although the termination letter dated 8th April 2016 was never delivered, the respondent's decision to terminate ended the suspension. The failure to communicate the termination meant the dismissal was without notice, rendering it wrongful. The declaration of unfair termination therefore issued on that basis.

p. 6
03

What reliefs flow from the unfair dismissal

Holding

Salary arrears for 7 months, one month's pay in lieu of notice, six months' compensation, and a certificate of service; leave and service pay claims denied

Reasoning

The court quantified arrears from suspension to termination at Kshs.315,000/=, awarded one month's notice pay per the contract rather than the three months sought, and exercised discretion under Section 49 to award six months' compensation despite the short service, citing the respondent's egregious conduct. Leave and service pay failed for want of earned entitlement.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • A termination without notice, without a disciplinary hearing, and without a valid substantive reason is wrongful, unfair and unlawful under Sections 41, 43, 45 and 47 of the Employment Act
  • Where a termination letter is not properly served, the court may find the employment relationship ended on the date the employer decided to terminate, treating the termination as a dismissal for lack of notice

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A declaration that the termination of the claimant by the respondent amounted to wrongful, unfair, and unlawful dismissal
  2. 2.Award of Kshs.630,000/= comprising salary arrears of Kshs.315,000/=, salary in lieu of notice of Kshs.45,000/=, and compensation for wrongful, unfair and unlawful dismissal of Kshs.270,000/=, subject to statutory deductions
  3. 3.The respondent to issue and deliver a certificate of service to the claimant within 30 days of the judgment
  4. 4.Costs of the cause to the claimant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 41
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 47
  • Employment ActSections 41, 43, 45, 47, 49(1)(c), 49(4), 51
  • Fair Administrative Action ActSections 4 to 6

Cases cited (3)

  • Walter Ogal Anuro V Teachers Service Commission
    (2013) eKLR
  • Jane Nyandiko V Kenya Commercial Bank
    (2017) eKLR
  • Pamela Nelima Lutta V Mumias Sugar Co. Ltd
    (2017) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction under the Employment Act; cause transferred from ELRC Nairobi to ELRC Nakuru as the cause of action arose at Naivasha, Nakuru County

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ngesa v Keroche Breweries Limited (Cause 1 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 2275 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Cause No. 1448 of 2016 (originally ELRC Nairobi; transferred to ELRC Nakuru). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/2275/eng@2023-09-28

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.