Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNot stated (Motion dated April 27, 2023 in execution of decree issued on 10/11/2022)· [2023] KEELRC 2225 (KLR)

Kenneth Odhiambo t/a Jenks Auctioneers v Ramogi & another (Cause 2 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 2225 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
27 September 2023
765 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

An auctioneer lost an execution bid in Kenya's Employment Court simply for skipping the correct procedure under the Auctioneers Rules, despite the debtor's unpaid judgment.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The ELRC at Kisumu, through Radido Stephen, Judge, dismissed a Motion dated April 27, 2023 brought by Kenneth Odhiambo t/a Jenks Auctioneers seeking assistance in executing a decree arising from an award of Kshs 1,844,896/- made on November 2, 2022 in favour of the Claimant against the Respondent. After the Respondent failed to settle the award, the parties entered a consent adopted by the Court in February 2023 to pay the balance in instalments. The instalments were not honoured, and the auctioneer sought orders for delivery of the judgment debtor's motor vehicles, authority to use reasonable force to take possession of proclaimed assets, and police escort and security from various stations in Kisumu. The judgment debtor opposed, citing financial hardship from multiple suits and reduced student enrolment, noting payments of Kshs 400,000/-, and contending the application was procedurally defective for not being brought as a miscellaneous application under the Auctioneers Rules. The Court noted the debtor's persistent non-compliance with the consent and affirmed that the claimant is entitled to the fruits of the judgment. However, it found that the auctioneer had disregarded the mode prescribed by the Auctioneers Rules for invoking the Court's jurisdiction in execution, tendered no explanation, and failed to file submissions as directed. The Court accordingly dismissed the Motion, with each party to bear its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Procedural regularity of the auctioneer's execution application

Holding

The application was dismissed for non-compliance with the Auctioneers Rules' prescribed mode of moving the Court in execution, with no explanation offered

Reasoning

The judgment records that the Auctioneers Rules prescribe how the Court should be moved in execution. The auctioneer disregarded that mode, tendered no explanation, and further failed to file submissions as directed by the Court. The Court thus declined the application on procedural grounds, notwithstanding that the judgment debtor had also defaulted on the consent to pay the decretal sum in instalments.

p. 2
02

Right of judgment creditor to execute despite judgment debtor's financial hardship

Holding

Financial difficulties do not bar execution where the debtor has failed to comply with a court-adopted consent to settle by instalments

Reasoning

The judgment debtor attributed non-payment to financial difficulty from multiple suits and reduced student enrolment, and noted it had paid Kshs 400,000/-. The Court held the claimant entitled to the fruits of judgment, having given the parties sufficient time to agree settlement modalities, and noting no agreement had been reached. Execution was therefore warranted.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A party in execution must invoke the Court's jurisdiction in the manner prescribed by the Auctioneers Rules, and an applicant who disregards that mode without explanation cannot obtain execution assistance orders
  • A judgment creditor is entitled to the fruits of the judgment, and indulgences on settlement modalities cannot indefinitely defer execution

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Motion dated April 27, 2023 dismissed
  2. 2.Each party to bear own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Auctioneers RulesMode of moving the Court in execution (not specified)
Jurisdiction invoked
ELRC execution jurisdiction over its decree; Auctioneers Rules invoked as the prescribed mode of moving the Court in execution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenneth Odhiambo t/a Jenks Auctioneers v Ramogi & another (Cause 2 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 2225 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Not stated (Motion dated April 27, 2023 in execution of decree issued on 10/11/2022). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/2225/eng@2023-09-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.