Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedPetition filed 14 January 2021, Kericho (ELRC)· [2023] KEELRC 2224 (KLR)

Bosire & 4 others v Nyaribo Governor, Nyamira County & 8 others (Petition 010 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 2224 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
27 September 2023
1,181 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court confirmed that county executive committee members automatically lose their jobs when a governor's office falls vacant, and no one owes them compensation.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Five former County Executive Committee (CEC) members of Nyamira County, appointed by Governor John Nyagarama on or around 14 April 2020, petitioned the Employment and Labour Relations Court after his death on 18 December 2020. Deputy Governor Amos Kimwomi Nyaribo assumed the governorship under article 182 of the Constitution and proceeded to nominate five new CEC members. The petitioners contended that their removal amounted to constructive dismissal, breached a legitimate expectation to serve until 31 August 2022, and violated their right to fair administrative action under article 47, as no reasons were given and no vacancies existed. They sought declarations, quashing of the 1st respondent's press statement of 6 January 2021, orders of prohibition against the filling of their former positions and the nominees from assuming office, and alternatively compensation of salaries and benefits to 31 August 2022, with costs. The court dismissed the petition. It held that under article 179(7), CEC members appointed with county assembly approval cease to hold office automatically when a vacancy arises in the office of governor; the cessation is by operation of law and attributable to no conduct or organ of the county government. Legitimate expectation cannot override a constitutional requirement, and no normative principle required fair administrative action before such automatic cessation. Article 47 arguments were a red herring, the Constitution being read holistically. The court condemned the petitioners to pay the respondents' costs, noting they had failed to assist the expeditious and proportionate determination of the petition.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether replacement of County Executive Committee members after the Governor's death amounted to constructive dismissal

Holding

No - the cessation of office was automatic by operation of article 179(7) of the Constitution and not attributable to any conduct or organ of the county government.

Reasoning

Article 179(7) provides that upon a vacancy in the office of county governor, County Executive Committee members appointed with county assembly approval cease to hold office. This cessation is not caused by any conduct of the members or any act of county government organs; it is by operation of law. Since no dismissal occurred, the doctrine of constructive dismissal under the contracts could not be invoked against the 1st respondent's nomination of successors.

p. 3
02

Whether the petitioners had a legitimate expectation to serve until 31 August 2022

Holding

No - legitimate expectation cannot override a constitutional requirement.

Reasoning

The petitioners asserted a legitimate expectation to serve to the end of the governor's term. The court held that such expectation cannot arise where it directly contravenes article 179(7), which requires cessation of office whenever a vacancy arises in the governor's office. As political appointees, a policy reason underlay the constitutional design, and the expectation claimed was contrary to an express constitutional provision.

p. 4
03

Whether the right to fair administrative action under article 47 was breached

Holding

No - article 47 was not engaged because the cessation occurred by operation of law, not by an administrative decision.

Reasoning

The petitioners argued article 47 was not ousted by article 179(7). The court treated this as a red herring, holding the Constitution must be read holistically. No legal or normative principle was cited obligating any organ to subject an office-holder, who ceases office automatically upon a vacancy in the governor's office, to fair administrative action. The petitioners cited no authority supporting such a duty.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a vacancy arises in the office of county governor, County Executive Committee members appointed with the approval of the County Assembly cease to hold office by operation of article 179(7) of the Constitution, without any fault on their part.
  • Legitimate expectation cannot arise in direct contravention of a constitutional provision.
  • The Constitution must be read and interpreted holistically, with each provision sustaining the others.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The petition is found devoid of any merit and is dismissed
  2. 2.The petitioners are condemned to pay the costs of the respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 179(7)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 182(1)(a) and 182(2)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 47
Jurisdiction invoked
Original petition under the Constitution (article 179(7) and article 47 read in context) before the Employment and Labour Relations Court

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Bosire & 4 others v Nyaribo Governor, Nyamira County & 8 others (Petition 010 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 2224 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Petition filed 14 January 2021, Kericho (ELRC). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/2224/eng@2023-09-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.