Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedELRC Cause dated May 5, 2017 (interlocutory application dated July 28, 2023)· [2023] KEELRC 2217 (KLR)

Mbuthu v De La Rue Currency and Security Print Limited (Cause 969 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 2217 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
28 September 2023
1,762 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court refused to force De La Rue to deposit Kshs 19 million in an employee's case, ruling that corporate group ties alone don't justify attachment before judgment.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is an interlocutory ruling in a part-heard employment claim in which the claimant, who had sued seeking one month's salary in lieu of notice, salary for December 2015 to June 2016, service pay for 12 years and 12 months' salary for wrongful dismissal totalling approximately Kshs. 19,072,632.40, applied on July 28, 2023 under Order 39 rules 1 and 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules for an order directing the respondent to deposit that sum in court pending determination of the suit, with attachment of the respondent's property in default. The application was prompted by a June 30, 2023 Business Daily article reporting that De La Rue was spending Sh2.7 billion to lay off staff and exit Kenya. The respondent opposed the application through a replying affidavit sworn by its Director, Francis Marigi Gakuru, contending that the article concerned De La Rue Kenya EPZ Limited, a separate entity in which the Government of Kenya holds a 40% stake, and producing a CR12 showing that the respondent is a distinct company with no government shareholding, no 2023 redundancy and no plan to wind up or exit Kenya. The claimant in a further affidavit sought to link the respondent to De La Rue PLC through the PLC's annual report. Ndolo J restated the Order 39 threshold, noting that at that stage neither party had proved its case, and held that although the claimant made a good effort to connect the three De La Rue entities, the corporate relationship alone was not sufficient cause to grant attachment before judgment. No evidence supported any of the statutory grounds. The application dated July 28, 2023 was disallowed with costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the claimant satisfied the conditions for attachment/security before judgment under Order 39 rules 1 and 5

Holding

The claimant did not; the application was disallowed with costs in the cause

Reasoning

The application was triggered by a Business Daily article concerning De La Rue Kenya EPZ Limited, a separate entity in which the Government of Kenya holds a 40% stake. The respondent produced a CR12 showing it is a distinct limited liability company with no government stake and no plan to wind up. Although the claimant made a good effort to link the respondent to De La Rue PLC and its EPZ subsidiary, the corporate relationship alone could not establish any of the statutory grounds — intent to delay or avoid court process, absconding, or disposal of property. No evidence supported any violation under Order 39 rule 1 and 5.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • At the interlocutory stage under Order 39 rule 1 and 5, none of the parties has proved their case on merit and the court must not saddle any party with obligations that ought to await final determination
  • A corporate relationship among associated entities, standing alone, is insufficient to justify attachment before judgment absent evidence of the statutory grounds

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The claimant's application dated July 28, 2023 is disallowed with costs in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 39 rules 1 and 5

Cases cited (2)

  • TNT Express Worldwide (Kenya) Limited v Timothy Graeme Steel
    (Civil Appeal E365 of 2018) KECA 881 (KLR) (10 June 2022)
  • Peter Onsongo Ogeto v Shem Osiago Morumbwa & another
    [2019] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court over a part-heard employment claim; interlocutory application under Order 39 rules 1 and 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mbuthu v De La Rue Currency and Security Print Limited (Cause 969 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 2217 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). ELRC Cause dated May 5, 2017 (interlocutory application dated July 28, 2023). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/2217/eng@2023-09-28

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.