Ng’ondu v Abyssinia Group of Industries (Miscellaneous Cause E189 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 2151 (KLR)
The bottom line
#What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the court has jurisdiction to grant leave to file suit out of time in an employment claim
The court has no jurisdiction to extend the limitation period for employment claims; extension under the Limitation of Actions Act applies only in cases of disability, acknowledgement, part payment, fraud or mistake, none of which were pleaded
Section 90 of the Employment Act read with section 4(1) of the Limitation of Actions Act sets a three-year limitation period for employment claims. The Limitation of Actions Act allows extension only for disability, acknowledgement, part payment, fraud or mistake, none pleaded here. Following Divecon v Samani and Maria Machocho v Total (K) Ltd, no court may entertain an action founded on contract filed out of time or extend time for it.
Legal principles established
#- Courts have no jurisdiction to extend the limitation period for actions founded on contract or arising out of the Employment Act
- Claims arising out of employment or a contract of service must be commenced within three years
Court orders
#- 1.The application dated November 7, 2022 seeking leave to file suit out of time is dismissed
- 2.No orders for costs since the Respondent did not file any response to the application
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Section 90 of the Employment Act and section 4(1) of the Limitation of Actions Act (Cap. 22)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Ng’ondu v Abyssinia Group of Industries (Miscellaneous Cause E189 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 2151 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Application dated November 7, 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/2151/eng@2023-09-21
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.