Kenya Private University Workers Union v Africa Nazarene University (Cause 900 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 1982 (KLR)
The bottom line
#The Employment and Labour Relations Court paused a university-union dispute so the National Labour Board can first decide whether the union still represents enough workers.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Stay of proceedings pending determination of the recognition revocation dispute by the National Labour Board
The Court stayed its own proceedings pending the National Labour Board's determination rather than ruling on the contempt and CBA applications.
The Respondent had applied to the National Labour Board for revocation of the Recognition Agreement on the ground that the Claimant Union had fallen below the simple majority representation threshold. The Court held that the revocation dispute was properly before the Board and that ruling on the CBA negotiation orders and contempt application would prematurely determine that question. The parties were directed to return to the Court once the Board had determined the matter.
Whether the Respondent's officials were in contempt of the order of 4th March 2019
Not decided; the contempt application was not determined on the merits because of the pending National Labour Board process.
The Claimant alleged wilful disobedience of the 4th March 2019 order directing compliance with sections 48 and 54 of the Labour Relations Act. The Respondent contended it had complied by signing the Recognition Agreement, that the Contempt of Court Act 2016 had been declared unconstitutional, and that contempt is a last resort where a civil remedy exists. The Court did not resolve these contentions, electing instead to stay the proceedings.
Whether the Claimant was entitled to orders compelling conclusion of the CBA and injunctive protection against victimisation
Not granted; the Court declined to direct parties to conclude the CBA process while the recognition revocation dispute was before the National Labour Board.
The Claimant sought an order compelling the Respondent to provide a counter proposal and conclude the CBA within 30 days, plus a prohibitory order against victimisation and coercion of members. The Respondent maintained the Union no longer commanded simple majority representation and had applied for revocation of the Recognition Agreement. The Court held it would usurp the Board's role by ordering conclusion of the CBA negotiations while the revocation application was pending.
Legal principles established
#- Where a dispute over revocation of a recognition agreement is properly before the National Labour Board, the ELRC should not determine the revocation question prematurely but should stay proceedings pending the Board's determination.
- Once the National Labour Board makes its determination, parties are bound to report back to the Court for further directions.
Court orders
#- 1.Stay of the proceedings before the Court pending the determination of the revocation of the recognition agreement by the National Labour Board, after which parties are to report back to the Court for further directions
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Section 12(3) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Kenya Private University Workers Union v Africa Nazarene University (Cause 900 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 1982 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Not stated in the judgment (separate proceedings referenced: ELRC No. 227 of 2020). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/1982/eng@2023-07-05
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.