Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCOtherNot stated in the judgment (appeal from CMCC E 6055/2022)· [2023] KEELRC 1637 (KLR)

Sahani v Ngaira & 3 others (Appeal E229 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 1637 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
6 July 2023
976 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court dismissed a challenge to its jurisdiction because the objectors failed to provide the key documents needed to decide the question.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court, delivered virtually in Nairobi on 6 July 2023 by Anna Ngibuini Mwaure J, determines a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 17 December 2022 raised by the respondents in an appeal arising from CMCC E 6055/2022. The respondents contended that the court lacked jurisdiction under section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Act because the subject matter of the appeal was not an employment or labour dispute. The appellant, who filed submissions dated 9 March 2023 (the respondents filed none), argued that the objection offended the Mukisa Biscuits test since it required investigation of facts, and that an employee's transfer was squarely an employment issue within the court's jurisdiction. The court identified two issues: its jurisdiction under section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, and whether the appeal was spent in light of the subordinate court's orders. The judge held that the pleadings instituting the subordinate-court suit were essential to deciding the jurisdictional question but had not been availed, so the court could not speculate on the parties' relationships; the objection therefore failed the pure-point-of-law test. The preliminary objection was dismissed, costs were in the cause, and the parties were directed to attempt amicable resolution, with mention on 31 July 2023 for directions on the appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the preliminary objection on jurisdiction was sustainable as a pure point of law

Holding

The objection was not a pure point of law because determining it would require investigating facts, and the underlying pleadings were not before the court; it was dismissed.

Reasoning

The court held that the pleadings used to institute the subordinate-court suit were instrumental to determining whether the dispute fell within section 12 of the ELRC Act. Those pleadings were not availed, so the court could not speculate on the parties' relationships from the application alone. The issue therefore required proof of facts and failed the Mukisa Biscuits test. The respondents also filed no submissions, depriving the court of their arguments on merits of the objection.

p. 2
02

Whether the ELRC has jurisdiction over the appeal

Holding

The court declined to make a decisive determination on its jurisdiction, holding the question could not be resolved without the CMCC pleadings, and dismissed the objection.

Reasoning

The appellant argued that transfer of an employee is a pure employment and labour issue within the court's jurisdiction under section 12 of the ELRC Act. The court, however, was not privy to the pleadings in CMCC E 6055/2022 and could not determine whether the parties were employees of the respondent. In the absence of concrete evidence, the jurisdictional question was left open and the preliminary objection was dismissed rather than upheld.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A preliminary objection must be a pure point of law; where facts must be investigated or proved, the matter cannot be raised as a preliminary point.
  • A court cannot determine its own jurisdiction without the underlying pleadings; absent the pleadings instituting the subordinate-court suit, the jurisdictional question cannot be resolved.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objection is dismissed
  2. 2.Mention on 31/7/2023 to give directions on the appeal; parties ordered to attempt to sort the matter amicably
  3. 3.Costs in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment and Labour Relations Actsection 12
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 48
  • Civil Procedure Act (Chapter 21, Laws of Kenya)Section 1B

Cases cited (2)

  • Engineer E.M Kinuthia T/A Associates Consulting Engineers v Attorney General and Another
    2014 eKLR
  • Mukisa Biscuits Manufacturing Co Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd
    1969 E.A 969
On appeal from
Subordinate court (CMCC)
CMCC E 6055/2022
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act (No. 20 of 2011)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Sahani v Ngaira & 3 others (Appeal E229 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 1637 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Not stated in the judgment (appeal from CMCC E 6055/2022). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/1637/eng@2023-07-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.