Theobald v Osani Community Health and Development Centre (Cause E005 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 1550 (KLR)
The bottom line
#What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the preliminary objection on jurisdiction meets the Mukisa Biscuit threshold
No. Whether the claimant was an employee or a consultant is a contested factual question requiring evidence at a hearing, so the objection is not a pure point of law and is dismissed.
The court applied the Mukisa Biscuit definition that a preliminary objection must raise a pure point of law on the assumption that all facts pleaded are correct, and cannot be raised if any fact has to be ascertained. Citing Kimondo J in Everret Aviation and Ibrahim Ulalo v Nation Media Group, it held that the nature of the relationship between the parties is a matter of fact requiring evidence. The claimant produced an appointment contract with terms of service, contesting the consultancy characterisation. The dispute could only be conclusively determined upon hearing both parties, so the objection failed.
Whether the relationship between the parties was a contract of service or a contract for services
This question could not be determined on the papers; it is a factual matter requiring evidence.
The respondent argued the claimant was engaged under a medical consultancy contract; the claimant asserted employment as medical superintendent under a contract dated July 15, 2021, renewed in March 2022, with salary progression from Kshs 90,000 to Kshs 111,000. Following Everret Aviation, the court noted the traditional control and integration tests are no longer conclusive and the form of documentation and mode of payment are critical, matters requiring evidence at a hearing rather than determination at the preliminary stage.
Legal principles established
#- Where the existence of an employer/employee relationship is contested, it is a matter of fact that can only be determined upon a hearing, and cannot be resolved by preliminary objection
Court orders
#- 1.The preliminary objection is dismissed
- 2.Costs shall be in cause
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court over employment disputes, contingent on existence of an employer/employee relationship
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Theobald v Osani Community Health and Development Centre (Cause E005 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 1550 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Not stated in the judgment as provided. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/1550/eng@2023-06-29
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.