Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCStruck OutNot stated in the judgment· [2023] KEELRC 1433 (KLR)

Kenya Union of Pre-Primary Education Teachers v County Public Service Board of Nyeri County Government & another; Salaries and Remuneration Commission (Interested Party) (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E030 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 1433 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
9 June 2023
1,717 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court struck out ECDE teachers' employment claims because the union went to court first instead of appealing to the Public Service Commission.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri (Onesmus N Makau, J) delivered on 9 June 2023 on the respondents' notice of preliminary objection dated 14 December 2022 seeking striking out of the suit with costs. The claimant, a registered trade union, sued on behalf of its members (ECDE teachers employed by the County Government of Nyeri on renewable contracts at a uniform salary of Kshs 12,650), seeking conversion to permanent and pensionable terms, payment of salary differences from November 2016, accumulated leave, supervision by TSC and SRC, and costs. The respondents objected that the court lacked jurisdiction under Article 234(2) of the Constitution, sections 87(2) and 88 of the Public Service Commission Act, section 77 of the County Governments Act, and section 9(2) of the Fair Administrative Actions Act, the grievance being appealable to the Public Service Commission and the statutory procedure not having been exhausted. Applying Mukisa Biscuits, the court held the objection raised pure points of law. It traced the statutory scheme, noting that section 87(2) of the PSC Act bars court proceedings before exhausting the Commission's appeal procedure, and that the grievance fell within Regulation 8 of the PSC Appeals Regulations. Holding that the court's jurisdiction was postponed rather than ousted, the court upheld the objection and struck out the suit with costs to the respondents.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the preliminary objection raises a pure point of law

Holding

Yes - the objections based on jurisdiction and exhaustion of the statutory appeal mechanism raise pure points of law requiring no evidence or exercise of judicial discretion.

Reasoning

Applying the Mukisa Biscuits definition, the court held that contentions that the court lacks jurisdiction pursuant to the exhaustion doctrine do not require evidence to establish nor the exercise of judicial discretion. If upheld, the objection would dispose of the suit and save judicial time, satisfying the test for a preliminary objection on a pure point of law.

p. 3
02

Whether the court lacks jurisdiction over the dispute

Holding

Yes - the grievance concerns remuneration and terms and conditions of service, an appealable matter under Regulation 8 of the PSC Regulations, so the Commission is the first port of call.

Reasoning

The court traced the statutory framework: Article 234 of the Constitution, section 77(1) of the County Governments Act (whose 'may' suggested an option), then section 85 and the mandatory bar in section 87(2) of the Public Service Commission Act, 2017. The grievance over regularisation of ECDE teachers' employment from fixed-term contracts to permanent and pensionable terms and placement in appropriate job groups falls squarely within Regulation 8. Since the procedure was not exhausted, the suit was struck out with costs.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Where an internal appeal mechanism to the Public Service Commission exists and has not been exhausted, the court's jurisdiction is postponed, not ousted
  • A person may not file legal proceedings in court regarding matters within the PSC's appellate jurisdiction until the statutory procedure is exhausted

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The suit was struck out with costs
  2. 2.Costs of the preliminary objection awarded to the respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 234 (including 234(2))
  • Public Service Commission Actsections 77, 85, 86, 87(2), 88(5)
  • County Governments Actsection 77(1)
  • Fair Administrative Actions Actsection 9(2)
  • Public Service Commission (County Government Services Appeals Procedure) RegulationsRegulation 8
  • ECDE Actnot specified
  • Employment Actnot specified
  • County HR Manualnot specified
  • ELRC Procedure RulesRule 28(3)

Cases cited (8)

  • Secretary County Public Service Board & another v Hulbhai Gedi Abdile
    [2016] eKLR
  • Kenya County Government Workers Union v Nyeri County Government & another
    [2019] eKLR
  • Nakuru County Human Rights Network (NAHURINET) v Nakuru County Government & another
    [2014] eKLR
  • James Tinai Murete & others v County Government of Kajiado & 22 others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Wilson Mutegi Nyaga & others v The County Public Service Board, Kitui County & 2 others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Ismael Noo Onyango & another v Siaya county Public Service Board & another
    [2018] eKLR
  • Mukisa Biscuits Manufacturing Co Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd
    [1969] EA 699
  • Petition 127 of 2014 (High Court decision regularising ECDE payments)
    Petition 127 of 2014
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 234(2) of the Constitution; section 77 of the County Governments Act; sections 85, 86, 87(2) and 88 of the Public Service Commission Act; section 9(2) of the Fair Administrative Actions Act (exhaustion doctrine)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Union of Pre-Primary Education Teachers v County Public Service Board of Nyeri County Government & another; Salaries and Remuneration Commission (Interested Party) (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E030 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 1433 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/1433/eng@2023-06-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.