Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No 173 of 2018· [2023] KEELRC 1430 (KLR)

Mwangi v Superiofone Holdings Ltd (Cause 173 of 2018) [2023] KEELRC 1430 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
15 June 2023
3,289 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~13 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employer who can't produce employment records like contracts and rosters will likely lose an unfair termination claim.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
In this Employment and Labour Relations Court cause at Nakuru, the Claimant, a room-stewardess employed by the Respondent at Lake Naivasha Resort from 5th June 2015, claimed she was sent away on 26th March 2017 upon reporting back from off-duty without notice, hearing or termination letter, and sought declarations and quantified reliefs totalling Kshs.370,669.28. The Respondent contended she deserted duty and that she was paid terminal dues of Kshs.17,200. The court identified four issues: unfair termination versus desertion, entitlement to reliefs, and costs. Relying on Sections 10 and 74 of the Employment Act, the court held the employer was obliged to produce employment records - contract, duty rosters, leave records - and drew an adverse presumption from their absence. The Respondent made no efforts to trace the allegedly deserting employee and did not reply to the labour officer's letter. The court found the Claimant was terminated without notice and without substantive or procedural fairness under Sections 41, 43, 45 and 47 of the Act. On reliefs, the court awarded house allowance of Kshs.37,800, notice pay of Kshs.11,300, six months' compensation of Kshs.72,000 applying Section 49(4) factors, overtime of Kshs.141,600 and public holiday pay of Kshs.14,769.28 - a total of Kshs.278,169.28. Claims for unremitted NHIF/NSSF deductions and severance pay were denied, the latter because severance under Section 40 applies only to redundancy. The claimant was awarded costs. Judgment delivered virtually at Nakuru on 15th June 2023 by David Nderitu, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Claimant was unfairly terminated or deserted duty

Holding

The court believed the Claimant's account that she was sent away by the manager on 26th March 2017 and concluded the Respondent terminated her unfairly and unlawfully without notice or hearing.

Reasoning

The Respondent, as employer, bore the duty under Sections 10 and 74 of the Employment Act to keep and produce employment records, contracts, duty rosters and leave records, and produced none. The court presumed the records were not kept or would have been adverse to the Respondent. There was no evidence of any effort to trace the allegedly deserting employee, no report to the labour office of desertion, and no reply to the labour officer's letter demanding compensation. The Respondent also admitted no disciplinary hearing or termination notice was issued.

p. 5
02

Entitlement to house allowance, notice pay, compensation, overtime and public holiday pay

Holding

House allowance of Kshs.37,800, one month's notice pay of Kshs.11,300 (net), six months' compensation of Kshs.72,000, overtime of Kshs.141,600 and public holiday pay of Kshs.14,769.28 were awarded.

Reasoning

RW1 admitted no housing or house allowance was provided, that the Claimant worked overtime and on public holidays, and no muster roll or records were produced to dislodge the pleaded figures. The gross salary of Kshs.12,000 was accepted since the Respondent produced no records to dislodge that evidence. Under Section 49(4) of the Act, considering the 21 months of service, non-specialized work, lack of terminal dues and no contributory conduct by the Claimant, six months' gross salary was fair compensation.

p. 6
03

Whether unremitted NHIF/NSSF deductions could be paid to the employee

Holding

Denied - the court cannot order statutory deductions paid to the employee where the statutory bodies are not party to the proceedings.

Reasoning

Once deducted, such sums belong to the statutory public bodies; releasing them to the employee without the bodies being party to the suit is legally unsound and there is no assurance the employee would remit them.

p. 6
04

Whether terminal dues were paid by the Respondent

Holding

The allegation of payment of terminal dues was rejected for want of evidence.

Reasoning

RW1 alleged payment of Kshs.17,200 in terminal dues but admitted in cross-examination that no evidence of such payment was availed. The court held no terminal dues were paid.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • Sections 10 and 74 of the Employment Act oblige the employer to keep and produce employment records; failure to do so invites an adverse presumption that the records were not kept or would have contradicted the employer's position.
  • Termination without notice, without a disciplinary hearing and without substantive and procedural fairness under Sections 41, 43, 45 and 47 of the Employment Act is unfair and unlawful.
  • Severance pay under Section 40 of the Employment Act is payable only on redundancy and is not available for termination by other modes; it is distinct from service pay.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A declaration that the termination of the Claimant by the Respondent was unfair and unlawful
  2. 2.The Claimant is awarded a total of Kshs.278,169.28 (house allowance Kshs.37,800; salary in lieu of notice Kshs.12,000; compensation Kshs.72,000; overtime Kshs.141,600; public holidays worked Kshs.14,769.28)
  3. 3.All other claims denied
  4. 4.Costs to the Claimant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSections 10, 74, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49(4), 40

Cases cited (3)

  • Anthony Makala Chitavi V Malindi Water & Sewerage Company Limited
    (2013) eKLR
  • Kenya Commercial Food & Allied Workers Union V Meru North Farmers Sacco Limited
    (2014) eKLR
  • Mary Chemweno Kiptui V Kenya Pipeline Company Limited
    (2014) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment disputes (Employment Act reliefs claimed; no specific constitutional article cited)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mwangi v Superiofone Holdings Ltd (Cause 173 of 2018) [2023] KEELRC 1430 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Cause No 173 of 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/1430/eng@2023-06-15

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.