Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedCause No E015 of 2023· [2023] KEELRC 1263 (KLR)

Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions and Hospital Workers v Shanzu Teachers College (Cause E015 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 1263 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
18 May 2023
1,348 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court confirmed that a trade union with a valid Recognition Agreement can sue an employer even if its membership has dropped.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa (M. Mbarũ, J) ruled on a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated March 17, 2023 filed by Shanzu Teachers College against a claim filed by a registered trade union on March 7, 2023, in which the union sought to compel the college to commence and conclude CBA negotiations. The respondent raised four grounds: the claimant lacked locus standi as an aggrieved party; the respondent was a non-juristic person incapable of being sued; the claimant had sued the wrong party; and the claim was incompetent, fatally defective and an abuse of process. The respondent argued that union membership had fallen to 23 of 64 employees (36.5%), below the simple majority required by Section 54(4) of the Labour Relations Act, and that its employees are remunerated on civil service scales set by the SRC, making a CBA futile. The claimant countered that the Recognition Agreement and CBA of September 19, 2013 were subsisting, that any membership decline was engineered by the respondent, and that a certificate of unresolved dispute had issued under Section 69 of the LRA on November 9, 2022. The court held that once an employer recognises a trade union, the Recognition Agreement endures notwithstanding diminished membership unless the employer applies to the National Labour Board under Section 54(5) for revocation, and that CBA negotiations are imperative before such revocation. Relying on Kenya National Union of Teachers v Nancy Njeri Macharia, the court found the claimant had proper standing and that the respondent, with whom a CBA exists, was a proper party to be sued. The objections were dismissed with costs, the claim was directed to be heard on the merits, and the respondent was given 14 days to comply with Rule 13 of the ELRC (Procedure) Rules, 2016.

Key legal issues

#
01

Locus standi of a recognised trade union whose membership is alleged to have fallen below a simple majority

Holding

The claimant has proper standing because recognition was achieved and a certificate of unresolved dispute issued under Section 69 of the LRA; loss of members cannot defeat a subsisting Recognition Agreement without recourse to the Board under Section 54(5).

Reasoning

Recognition under Section 54(2) of the LRA confers on a trade union the status necessary for CBA negotiations. Once recognition is granted, the agreement endures even if membership diminishes; revocation lies only through an application by the employer to the National Labour Board under Section 54(5). It is not sufficient for an employer to merely cite loss of members. Having obtained a certificate of unresolved dispute under Section 69, the claimant was within its rights to move the court.

p. 2
02

Whether the respondent is a non-juristic person and a wrong party to the suit

Holding

The respondent, having signed a Recognition Agreement and CBA with the claimant, is a proper party to be sued.

Reasoning

The court noted it is not in dispute that the parties have a CBA and the suit relates to the respondent's refusal to engage in negotiations for a new CBA. Since a Recognition Agreement and CBA dated September 19, 2013 exist between the claimant and the respondent, and the certificate of unresolved dispute issued against the respondent, the employer with whom a CBA exists is a proper party to be sued. The objection that remedies cannot lie against the respondent was rejected, and the claim directed to be heard on the merits.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Once an employer has recognised a trade union, the Recognition Agreement stands notwithstanding a diminution in membership unless terminated or revoked under Section 54(5) of the LRA through an application to the National Labour Board.
  • Before an employer may invoke Section 54(5) of the LRA to revoke a recognition agreement, CBA negotiations with the recognised union are imperative.
  • Where a dispute has been reported to the Minister and a certificate of unresolved dispute has issued under Section 69 of the LRA, the trade union has proper standing to move the court and the employer with whom a CBA exists is a proper party to be sued.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objections dated March 17, 2023 are found without merit and dismissed with costs to the claimant
  2. 2.The respondent is given 14 days to comply with Rule 13 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016
  3. 3.The claim shall proceed to be addressed on the merits

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Labour Relations Act, 2007Section 54(1)-(8), including Section 54(4) and Section 54(5)
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007Section 69
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016Rule 13

Cases cited (3)

  • Tabitha Njambi Chigua & 12 others v County Government of Kiambu
    [2016] eKLR
  • Kenya Chemical & Allied Workers Union v Milly Glass Works Limited
    Cause No 421 of 2017
  • Kenya National Union of Teachers (Knut) v Nancy Njeri Macharia & another
    [2020] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Jurisdiction under the Labour Relations Act, 2007 (Section 54 read with Section 69, certificate of unresolved dispute) and the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions and Hospital Workers v Shanzu Teachers College (Cause E015 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 1263 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Cause No E015 of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/1263/eng@2023-05-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.