Apondi v Timberland Construction Company (Cause 583 of 2016) [2023] KEELRC 1186 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Mombasa court awarded a casually dismissed worker Ksh 192,000 because his employer skipped the hearing and had no proof of a fair dismissal process.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the Claimant was continuously employed by the Respondent
The Court found continuous employment proved on a balance of probability, corroborated by NHIF and NSSF remittance records
The Claimant produced an NHIF Member Data Summary showing the Respondent remitted his contributions for 2013, 2014 and 2015, and an NSSF statement showing contributions for part of 2013, 2014 and 2015. The Respondent, having failed to attend court or call evidence, did not controvert or rebut this evidence. The Claimant's testimony that he worked continuously from Monday to Saturday therefore stood unchallenged and proved employment.
Whether the termination of the Claimant's employment was unfair
The verbal termination without reasons or disciplinary proceedings was unfair
The Claimant's unchallenged evidence was that his services were terminated verbally on 6/1/2016 without any reasons and without any disciplinary proceedings. The Respondent did not demonstrate compliance with section 41 of the Employment Act or adherence to justice and equity. On the uncontroverted material, the Court found the termination unfair.
Entitlement to compensation and terminal dues
Nine months' salary awarded as compensation for unfair termination; one month's notice pay allowed under section 35(1)(c); leave pay of ksh. 42,000 awarded; gratuity disallowed due to NSSF membership; certificate of service ordered
Having found unfair termination, the Court exercised discretion under section 49 to award nine months' salary based on the uncontradicted monthly wage of ksh. 15,000. Notice pay was allowed under section 35(1)(c). Under section 28(1)(a) the Claimant was entitled to twenty-one days' leave per year of service, computed at 15,000/30X21X4. Section 35(6)(d) barred gratuity for an NSSF member.
Legal principles established
#- Where a party fails to adduce evidence in support of its case, its pleadings remain mere statements of fact and the opposing party's uncontroverted evidence stands unchallenged.
- Termination of employment without reasons and without disciplinary proceedings offends section 41 of the Employment Act and is unfair.
Court orders
#- 1.Judgment entered for the Claimant against the Respondent for compensation for unfair termination of ksh. 135,000, one month salary in lieu of notice of ksh. 15,000, and unpaid leave days of ksh. 42,000, total ksh. 192,000
- 2.The awarded sum is subject to statutory deductions pursuant to section 49(2) of the Employment Act
- 3.The Respondent shall issue the Claimant with a Certificate of Service within thirty days of the judgment pursuant to Section 51 of the Employment Act
- 4.The Claimant is awarded costs of the suit and interest at Court rates
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Employment Act, 2007 (original employment and labour relations jurisdiction)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Apondi v Timberland Construction Company (Cause 583 of 2016) [2023] KEELRC 1186 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Cause No 583 of 2016. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/1186/eng@2023-05-18
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.