Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No E037 of 2022· [2023] KEELRC 1136 (KLR)

Oyuga v Everett Aviation (Charter) Limited (Cause E037 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 1136 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
5 May 2023
4,022 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~16 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court confirmed that a fixed term contract simply expires on its end date, so non-renewal is not unfair termination and pay gaps can be justified by different skills.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, a Licenced Avionics Engineer, was employed by the respondent under a one-year fixed term contract effective January 6, 2020, terminable by three months' notice, at a gross monthly salary of Kshs 200,000. He was promoted to Line Avionics Engineer effective November 1, 2020 at Kshs 250,000 gross, and by letter dated January 7, 2021 his contract was extended to January 5, 2022, terminating automatically on that date. On January 5, 2022 the respondent notified him that the contract would not be renewed and offered terminal dues including one month's salary in lieu of notice. The claimant sued for unfair termination, breach of legitimate expectation, and racial discrimination, alleging he was paid far less than a South African engineer, Mr Vivian Mathews, claiming Kshs 14,605,000 in total plus costs and interest. The respondent denied unfair termination, contending the contract expired automatically, and justified the pay disparity on the ground that Mr Mathews was an Airframe and Power Plant engineer with over 30 years' helicopter experience and Type Rating on the BK 117, whereas the claimant had no prior helicopter experience. The court framed three issues and held that the contract expired automatically by its own terms; the January 5, 2022 letter was a reminder of non-renewal, not a termination notice, and the three months' notice clause applied only to termination before expiry. No legitimate expectation of renewal arose. The discrimination claim failed as the pay disparity was justified by different qualifications, experience and duties. All monetary reliefs were dismissed for lack of merit or evidence; only the unopposed prayer for a certificate of service was granted. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the claimant's fixed term contract was unfairly terminated or expired automatically

Holding

The contract expired automatically on January 5, 2022 as agreed; no unfair termination.

Reasoning

The extension letter dated January 7, 2021 expressly stated the contract would terminate automatically on January 5, 2022. The January 5, 2022 letter was a reminder of non-renewal, not a termination notice. The contract did not require prior notice of non-renewal; the 3 months' notice clause applied only to termination before expiry. Legitimate expectation of renewal was not established.

p. 7
02

Whether the claimant had a legitimate expectation of contract renewal

Holding

No legitimate expectation arose from the supervisor allocating work or from the prior renewal.

Reasoning

The supervisor had no mandate to enter into contracts of service. The claimant knew his contract was expiring on January 5, 2022. Renewal was by mutual agreement only, and no policy or notice-of-non-renewal clause (as in the authorities relied on by the claimant) existed here.

p. 7
03

Whether the salary disparity between the claimant and Mr Vivian Mathews constituted discrimination

Holding

No discrimination; the disparity was justified.

Reasoning

The claimant was an Avionics Engineer with no prior helicopter experience and no Type Rating, while Mr Mathews was an Airframe and Power Plant Engineer with over 30 years' helicopter experience and Type Rating on the BK 117. The claimant did not rebut this evidence, and discrimination requires unjustified differential treatment of persons in similar circumstances.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • In fixed term contracts the issue of unfair termination does not arise because the contract expires automatically on the agreed date, and the employer has no obligation to give prior notice or a reason for non-renewal unless the contract so requires.
  • Discrimination occurs only where persons in similar circumstances are treated differently without justification such as levels of responsibility, expertise, experience or skills.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Suit dismissed save for the unopposed prayer for a certificate of service.
  2. 2.Claimant to be issued with a certificate of service having completed exit clearance.
  3. 3.Each party to bear own costs.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Act, 2007Section 51
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) RulesRule 28(3)

Cases cited (7)

  • Linda Ndenengo Mwakugu v Open Society Institute Company Limited
    (2020) eKLR
  • John Nduba v Africa Medical and Research Foundation (AMREF Health Africa)
    (2020) eKLR
  • Jayne Kanini Mwanza v National Water Conservation and Pipeline Corporation
    (2014) eKLR
  • Oshwal Academy (Nairobi) & another v Indu Vishwanath
    (2015) eKLR
  • Registered Trustee of the Presbyterian Church of East Africa & Another v Ruth Gathoni Kariuki
    (2017) eKLR
  • Bernard Wanjohi Muriuki v Kirinyaga Water and Sanitation Co Ltd & Another
    (2012) eKLR
  • Teresa Carlo Omondi v Transparency International-Kenya
    (2017) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under Article 162(2) of the Constitution (employment and labour relations dispute, heard under the Employment Act, 2007)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Oyuga v Everett Aviation (Charter) Limited (Cause E037 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 1136 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Cause No E037 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/1136/eng@2023-05-05

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.