Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNotice of motion dated February 21, 2023 (arising from Petition dismissed by judgment of August 7, 2020)· [2023] KEELRC 1004 (KLR)

Kenya Association of Health Administrators v Salaries and Remuneration Commission & 3 others; Kenya Health Professionals Society & another (Interested Parties) (Petition 77 of 2020) [2023] KEELRC 1004 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
26 April 2023
1,776 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employment court dismissed a late attempt to reopen a decided case, confirming that litigation must end and final rulings stand.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The petitioner, by notice of motion dated February 21, 2023 supported by the affidavit of Emily Orina, sought to set aside the ruling and order of April 20, 2021 which had dismissed its notice of motion dated October 30, 2020 (itself a review application against the judgment of August 7, 2020 by Justice Radido dismissing the entire petition). Counsel Mr Kibe argued that the ruling was delivered despite a pending motion of April 12, 2021 seeking to halt it, that the parties had been absent due to misleading directions, and that this offended natural justice and the right to fair hearing. Mr Wahome for the 2nd respondent opposed, relying on grounds of opposition: the applicant failed to comply with directions of February 24, 2021, the court became functus officio upon delivery of the April 20, 2021 ruling, and the present application, filed almost two years late, was an afterthought, frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of process. The court held that the April 12, 2021 motion was overtaken by events and its non-hearing did not vitiate the proceedings or deny fair trial; litigation must come to an end and a final decision cannot be reopened merely because an attempt to halt the ruling failed. The motion was dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Key legal issues

#
01

Effect of failure to hear an interlocutory application to halt a ruling

Holding

The motion of April 12, 2021 was overtaken by events and its non-hearing did not vitiate the ruling of April 20, 2021 or amount to denial of fair hearing

Reasoning

The court held that applications are often withdrawn, abandoned or become otiose by effluxion of time. The April 12, 2021 motion merely sought halting of the ruling; the right to fair trial applies equally to all parties and the petitioner's non-attendance at the mention did not render the trial unfair, as the court considered the law and rendered justice.

p. 3
02

Finality of litigation and abuse of process

Holding

A party cannot reopen a concluded case merely because an attempt to halt a ruling failed; the application was an abuse of process deserving dismissal with costs

Reasoning

The court emphasised that when a final decision is given, a party cannot go back and reopen the case. The petitioner's application, filed almost two years after the ruling, was devoid of merit, scandalous, frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of court process, warranting dismissal with costs.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Litigation must come to an end; a final decision cannot be reopened merely because a party's attempt to halt the ruling failed
  • An application may become otiose or be overtaken by events, and failure to have it heard does not vitiate subsequent proceedings or deny a party fair trial

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The petitioner's notice of motion dated February 21, 2023 seeking to set aside the ruling and order of April 20, 2021 is dismissed

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules - rule 33 (review)rule 33
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court over its own proceedings (review application under rule 33)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Association of Health Administrators v Salaries and Remuneration Commission & 3 others; Kenya Health Professionals Society & another (Interested Parties) (Petition 77 of 2020) [2023] KEELRC 1004 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Notice of motion dated February 21, 2023 (arising from Petition dismissed by judgment of August 7, 2020). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/1004/eng@2023-04-26

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.