Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCStruck OutJudicial Review Application (Notice of Motion dated 7th December 2022)· [2023] KEELRC 998 (KLR)

Republic v Tourism Regulatory Authority; Ogwel (Ex parte Applicant) (Judicial Review E032 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 998 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
19 April 2023
5,312 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~21 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Employment Court struck down a dismissed TRA officer's attempt to use judicial review, confirming state corporations can discipline their own staff without the Public Service Commission.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Ex parte Applicant, Samson Tabu Ogwel, sought an order of certiorari to quash the Tourism Regulatory Authority's letter dated 13th October 2022 summarily terminating his services as Chief Supply Chain Management Officer. He argued that as a civil servant who had served more than fifteen years in the public service, disciplinary control over him vested in the Public Service Commission under section 65 of the PSC Act 2017, and that the Respondent's decision was ultra vires, irrational and procedurally improper, contrary to Articles 41, 47 and 50 of the Constitution. The Respondent, through a Replying Affidavit sworn by its Legal Officer Carolyne Sein Leitoro, countered that the Applicant ceased to be a civil servant when he applied for, was interviewed and appointed to his TRA position in 2017, with his pensionable service transferred from the Ministry of Tourism; that his termination followed a lawful internal disciplinary process triggered by audit findings of irregular procurement, falsification of records and mismanagement; and that the termination satisfied both substantive justification and procedural fairness. In submissions, the Applicant relied on Anthony v Communications Authority of Kenya and related authorities to assert PSC oversight; the Respondent relied on Kudhehia Workers, Fredrick Otieno Outa and employment-law authorities on fair termination. The court, Nzioki Wa Makau J, held that judicial review is confined to legality and procedural regularity, that the TRA is a body corporate with power under sections 4 and 14(5) of the Tourism Act to hire its own staff, and that the Applicant was therefore not subject to the PSC's disciplinary mandate. Certiorari could not issue; the application was struck out with no order as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Applicant fell under the disciplinary control of the PSC under section 65 of the PSC Act 2017

Holding

He did not; having been appointed by the TRA following the deployment and fresh recruitment, he was an employee of the Respondent, not a civil servant under the PSC.

Reasoning

The court reasoned that the TRA is a body corporate established under section 4 of the Tourism Act 2011 with power to sue and be sued, and that section 14(5) grants its board power to hire staff. The Applicant applied for, was interviewed for, and accepted appointment as Chief Supply Chain Management Officer of the TRA, with his pensionable service transferred from the Ministry of Tourism. The PSC Act disciplinary regime applies to civil servants in Ministries and State Departments, not to employees of such an autonomous body corporate.

p. 9
02

Whether certiorari should issue to quash the termination letter dated 13th October 2022

Holding

Certiorari cannot issue; the claim lies elsewhere.

Reasoning

Having found that the Respondent was not subject to the PSC's disciplinary mandate, the court held the Applicant was misguided in imagining his contract was subject to the PSC's dictates. The court also confined itself, in judicial review, to legality and procedural regularity rather than the merits. Since the Respondent had jurisdiction over the disciplinary process, the decision was not made without or in excess of jurisdiction and could not be quashed.

p. 9

Legal principles established

#
  • A state corporation established under an Act of Parliament with power to hire its own staff may initiate and conclude a disciplinary process including dismissal without reference to the PSC
  • Judicial review is confined to legality and procedural regularity, not the merits of the decision

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Application for judicial review is struck out
  2. 2.No order as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya 2010Articles 41, 47, 50, 229, 260
  • Public Service Commission Act 2017sections 2, 65(1), 65(2)(a), 65(3), 74, 75
  • Public Service Commission Regulations 2020regulations 61, 62
  • Public Service Commission (State Corporations and Public Universities Disciplinary Appeals Procedures) Regulations, 2022
  • Human Resource Policies and Procedures Manual of the PSCsection K.4 (iii)
  • Tourism Act No. 28 of 2011sections 4, 9(3), 11, 14(5), 16(1) and (2)(a), Ninth Schedule
  • State Corporations Actsections 3, 5(3), 11
  • Public Procurement & Asset Disposal Act No. 33 of 2015
  • Public Finance Management Regulations 2015section 219(2)
  • Law Reform Act (Cap 26)section 8(2)
  • Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21)section 27(1) and (2)
  • Public Audit Act
  • Employment Actsections 41, 45(2)

Cases cited (10)

  • Anthony v Communications Authority of Kenya & 3 others
    (Petition E161 of 2021) [2022] KEELRC 1117 (KLR) (25 January 2022)
  • John Mburu Kamau v Kenya Accreditation Service
    [2021] eKLR; Neutral citation: [2021] KEELRC 8 (KLR)
  • Judicial Service Commission v Mbalu Mutava & another
    [2015] eKLR
  • Okoiti & 3 others v Anne Waiguru, the Cabinet Secretary, Devolution and Planning & 5 others
    (Petition 42 & 27 of 2014 (Consolidated)) [2021] KEELRC 2306 (KLR) (30 July 2021)
  • Republic v Chief Magistrate Makindu & another Ex-Parte Bernard Masau Mailu & 2 others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Education and Allied Workers (Kudhehia Workers) v Salaries and Remuneration Commission
    [2014] eKLR
  • Fredrick Otieno Outa v Jared Odoyo Okello & 3 Others
    [2014]
  • Walter Ogal Anuro v Teachers Service Commission
    [2013] eKLR
  • Janet Nyandiko v Kenya Commercial Bank Limited
    [2017] eKLR
  • National Bank of Kenya v Anthony Njue John
    [2019] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Supervisory judicial review jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court under section 8 of the Law Reform Act (Cap 26) and Article 47 of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v Tourism Regulatory Authority; Ogwel (Ex parte Applicant) (Judicial Review E032 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 998 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Judicial Review Application (Notice of Motion dated 7th December 2022). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/998/eng@2023-04-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.